Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (hearing transcript, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation, 17 May 2022)

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence · 2022-05-17 · 53 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of the open session of a hearing on unidentified aerial phenomena, held on 17 May 2022 by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence's Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation. Under Secretary Ronald Moultrie and Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence Scott Bray testified on the new AOIMSG office, efforts to reduce stigma in reporting, and a UAP database of about 400 reports. Bray showed videos, explained flashing triangles as drones seen through night vision goggles, and called the 2004 Nimitz incident unresolved.

17
In this example, we accumulated sufficient data from two similar encounters from
two different time periods in two different geographic areas to help us draw these
conclusions. That is not always the case, though. We recognize that that can be
unsatisfying or insufficient in the eyes of many. It is a popular topic in our Nation with
various theories as to what these objects may be and where they originate. By nature,
we are all curious. And we seek to understand the unknown. And, as a lifelong
necessary professional, I am impatient. I want immediate explanations for this as much
as anyone else.
However, understanding can take significant time and effort. It is why we have
endeavored to concentrate on this data-driven process, to drive fact-based results. And
given the nature of our business, national defense, we have had to sometimes be less
forthcoming with information in open forums than many would hope.
If UAP do indeed represent a potential threat to our security, then the capability,
systems, processes, and sources we use to observe, record, study, or analyze these
phenomena need to be classified at appropriate levels. We do not want, we do not
want potential adversaries to know exactly what we are able to see or understand or how
we come to the conclusions we make. Therefore, public disclosures must be carefully
considered on a case-by-case basis.
So what is next? We are concentrating on a seamless transition to the new
organization. Future analysis of complicated issues, of UAP issues, will greatly benefit
from the infrastructure of the process and the procedures that we have developed to
date. I am confident that the task force under Navy leadership has forged a path
forward that will allow us to anchor assessments in science and engineering vice
anecdotal evidence. We remain committed to that goal, as I know the USDI
organization does as well.

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 53 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.