Documents / Report
This is the final report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, conducted by the University of Colorado under Air Force contract F44620-67-C-0035, with Edward U. Condon as scientific director and Daniel S. Gillmor as editor. It was submitted to the National Academy of Sciences on 15 November 1968 for review. The report includes field studies, photographic and radar analyses, case studies, historical chapters and appendices such as the Robertson Panel report and the Twining letter.
correspondence with them. He is motivated by an active curiosity about nature and by a personal desire to make a contribution to science. lie i~; con;;tantly probing for error and incompleteness in the efforts thnt hal'e b\~en m",de in h15 fields of in,,~rest, and look- ing f"r new ideas about new ways to attack new prob leIns, From this effort he arrives It pel~onal decisions as to where his own vffart can be most fl'uitful. 'Dlese decisions are personal in the senSe that he mus t estimate hi.'; L,wr, intt'llectual limi tat ions, an.d the limitations inherent in the i,wrking si tuation in which he finds himself, includ- ing limits on the support of hi~ work, or hi~ invo.vement ~ith other pr~-cxisting scientific commitments. While individual errors of jUdgment may ar1~,'..;. : i~~ generally not true that all of the scientists who are actively cl_tivating a given field of science arc wrong for vrney, and for medical treatment !;I_'nsibl e people seek' qua 1,ified phY"iciall. The nation's surest gL.arantu: of scicntiflc excellence is to leave the decision-making iJroces~ to the indhidual and collective judgment of its scientists. Scientists are no respecters of author.~ty. Our conclusion tlHi.t study of UF', l'::ports is not likely to advancc' ~;dence will not he uncritically ar,;G(~pted by them. Nor shculcl it be, nor do we wish it to he. FOl scientif;ts, it i~ our hope that the detailed finalyth.:al pre- 5rntation c/ w"at \\'(: werE' able to do, and of what I'll' were unable to do, ~'il1 assist them in deciding whether or not ~hcy agree with our con- cll1sioll~. (Jur hope is that the details of this report wi.ll help other scientists in st~eing "hat thl' problems are and the difficulties of co~ing with them. If they agree Idth vur conclusions, they \dll turn their valllablE:' attl'nticn ano talents elsewhere. If they disagree it will be bccf".';(· correspondence with them. fle]s motivatod by an active curiosity about nature and by a personal desire to make a contribution to science. lie i!i con3tan tly probing for error and Incompleteness in the efforts thHt have b,'en rn"de in his fields of in,,0rest, and look- ing f~r new ideas about new ways to attack new problems, From this effort he arrhd~s 1t pelsonal decisIons as to where his own effort can be mOEt fruitful, 'DIes£' decisions are personal in the sense that he must estimate Itis coWl'. intdlectual limi tations, an.d the lirni tations inherent in the working situation in which he finds himself, includ- ing limits on the support of his work, or hi!' invo"vement ·o:ith other pr~·<.,.dsting scientific commitments. While individual errors of judgment may ari,,'~, : i:, generally not true that all of the scientist~ who are activel." (;l _ :_ivating a given field of science arc wrong for v<'ry long. Even concedL1g tlut the cntire body of 'c''fidal'' science might be in error for a time, we believe that. thcI" , i:i no hette:..' way to correct error thal1 to gl ve free reign to the id,~as cf individual "c:ienrists to mak,~' uccisions as to the dirc'.'tior,'.. iil which scientific J rogress i~ most like ly to be made. For legal "ark scr:"ible ;)copl(. seek an att'Jrney, and for medical treatment ';I.'!lsib 1e peopLe seek qua 1.i.fied phy,;ician. The nation's surest gl..arantlt' of ';clcntijic exee 11 ence is to leaV<' the decis ion-making iJroces~ to the indh idua I and collective judgment of its scientists, Scientists are no respecters of author~ty, Our conclusion ~lut study of UF', l'~ports is lWt Lii<.(Jly to advance !;clencc wi 11 not he ul1criticall) al~c~~pteJ bv them, Nor shculu it be, nor do we wi~h it to he, FOT ~ci(,llt:iS ts, i t i~ our hope that the uet.ailed finalyti..:al pre- srntation c/ w"at "'(: wen' able to ,}o, and of what I"e were unsule to do, \'I'ill assist them in deciding whl'ther or not ~hey agree with our cort- ClllSioll~, (Jur hepe is that the details of this report w111 help other scientists til st~eing "hat thl' problems arc and tlH~ difficulties of cO!-,i ng with tllem, If they agree Ivlth our (.ollclusions, they w.i11 turn their valllJhle attl'nt.icn and talents elsewhere. If they uisagree it wi 11 be bccw.,;t,
Report, from the classic collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 1497 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.