Context
The sighting
Several joggers were on the road that circles the airfield. Low on the horizon, they saw a red-orange ball. It stayed motionless above the field just before the airfield. It was the size of a football. Then it disappeared abruptly. It seemed to have fallen into the field. At no point did they hear any particular noise.
One witness grouped with the joggers, a 30-year-old woman, saw it at 08:00, level with the horizon at an azimuth of 250°, roughly west-south-west. Spherical. Red and the colour of fire. Stationary. Silent.
At the runway, two firefighters were on duty with the airport's fire-safety service. Around eight, they saw a glowing orange ball advance over the runway, as if coming in to land. As it descended, it grew larger. One firefighter immediately warned the control tower. The object vanished instantly.
About 10 km to the south-west, another witness was waiting at the bus station in Brest. Standing still, unlike the joggers, this witness had the attention needed for details.
The investigation
The next day, the air traffic controller at Guipavas called the Gendarmerie. Eight statements were collected. Seven described the phenomenon, from four independent groups of people. According to the older case summary, the CRNA, the regional air traffic control centre, also reported a spot on its radar at the time of the sighting.
The file went to GEPAN, the unidentified phenomena unit of the French space agency CNES, now known as GEIPAN. It was rated D. Unexplained, despite good data. It stayed that way for decades. In 2012, GEIPAN director Xavier Passot called it an interesting file that could be the subject of a new investigation.
The explanation
That review came on 31 October 2019, in a batch of old D cases. GEIPAN's conclusion: probable observation of an atmospheric re-entry of a meteoroid. It pointed to the red-orange colour, the ball shape, sparks and a trail similar to that of a shooting star, the short duration, probably slow and regular movement, and a disappearance by descent, with a fall to the ground for one witness. A tangential re-entry seen head-on, GEIPAN explained, can look like a bright point low on the horizon that barely moves, even appearing immobile when the trajectory is well aligned with the observation axis. The accounts differed in description but did not contradict one another. The case was moved to B, probable explanation.
Not every thread is tied. The published summaries do not say how the review handled the radar spot, or why the firefighters saw the ball approach the runway and grow. The older summary also puts the start at 07:40, not 07:55.
Legacy
Brest ufologist Thierry Larquet, a former local GEIPAN investigator, has kept the case in view. A 2012 profile remembered it simply: a luminous ball the size of a football that would have fallen into a field. No photograph or film is known. The witnesses remain anonymous, known in the file only as T1 to T8.
Comments (0)
No comments yet.