Documents / Report

UAP Independent Study Team Final Report

NASA · 2023-09-14 · 36 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the final report of NASA's Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Team, a 16-member external panel chaired by Dr. David Spergel, with a foreword by Dr. Nicola Fox. The report says it is not a review of past incidents. It concludes that UAP analysis is limited by poor data, calibration and metadata, and that NASA should support AARO's whole-of-government effort. It recommends using NASA satellites, commercial imagery, AI, crowdsourcing apps and the Aviation Safety Reporting System, and reducing stigma around reporting.

Open the PDF Original source ↗

“small beings”6 pages

  • p. 5 …relatively small objects such as UAP, their state-of-the-art sensors can be directly utilized…
  • p. 11 …Most of these events have since been explained, but a small handful cannot be immediately identified…
  • p. 13 …For example, the advanced sensors on the Terra and Aqua missions should be directly utilized to…
  • p. 26 …Most of these events have since been explained, but a small handful cannot be immediately identified…
  • p. 30 …But the analysis reveals that the object need not be moving at an extraordinary velocity. Note…
  • p. 34 …If the background cannot be minimized, it has to be charac- terized in detail and completely…
NASA
UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA
Independent Study Team Report

Cited by

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 36 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.