Documents / Report
UAP Independent Study Team Final Report
NASA · 2023-09-14 · 36 pages · text from the file's own layer
This is the final report of NASA's Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Team, a 16-member external panel chaired by Dr. David Spergel, with a foreword by Dr. Nicola Fox. The report says it is not a review of past incidents. It concludes that UAP analysis is limited by poor data, calibration and metadata, and that NASA should support AARO's whole-of-government effort. It recommends using NASA satellites, commercial imagery, AI, crowdsourcing apps and the Aviation Safety Reporting System, and reducing stigma around reporting.
“multiple objects”7 pages
- p. 5 …At present, analysis of UAP data is hampered by poor sensor calibration, the
lack of multiple…
- p. 15 …The importance of detecting UAP with multiple,
well-calibrated sensors is paramount, and NASA should leverage…
- p. 16 …Additionally, near-Earth objects (NEO) programs also
have significant data collections about phenomena close to Earth…
- p. 28 …Recently, most innovation has
been accomplished by combining information from multiple observatories that operate at different…
- p. 32 …An object’s motion should be
recorded, as well as its shape (imaging data), color (multispectra…
- p. 33 …human aircrafts, drones,
balloons, and other objects, are all significant sources of background.
Geographically, sparsely occupied…
- p. 35 …In addition, solar system exploration offers multiple possibilities for technosignature
searches at modest additional costs. These…
NASA
UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA
Independent Study Team Report
About this file
Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 36 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.