Documents / Report

UAP Independent Study Team Final Report

NASA · 2023-09-14 · 36 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the final report of NASA's Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Team, a 16-member external panel chaired by Dr. David Spergel, with a foreword by Dr. Nicola Fox. The report says it is not a review of past incidents. It concludes that UAP analysis is limited by poor data, calibration and metadata, and that NASA should support AARO's whole-of-government effort. It recommends using NASA satellites, commercial imagery, AI, crowdsourcing apps and the Aviation Safety Reporting System, and reducing stigma around reporting.

  • p. 5 …At present, analysis of UAP data is hampered by poor sensor calibration, the lack of multiple…
  • p. 15 …The importance of detecting UAP with multiple, well-calibrated sensors is paramount, and NASA should leverage…
  • p. 16 …Additionally, near-Earth objects (NEO) programs also have significant data collections about phenomena close to Earth…
  • p. 28 …Recently, most innovation has been accomplished by combining information from multiple observatories that operate at different…
  • p. 32 …An object’s motion should be recorded, as well as its shape (imaging data), color (multispectra…
  • p. 33 …human aircrafts, drones, balloons, and other objects, are all significant sources of background. Geographically, sparsely occupied…
  • p. 35 …In addition, solar system exploration offers multiple possibilities for technosignature searches at modest additional costs. These…
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FOREWORD
INTRODUCTION
RESPONSES TO STATEMENT OF TASK
OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
WORK PRODUCTS: DISCUSSION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Group Photo: Members of the NASA Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Team.
3
7
9
11
21
23
24

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 36 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.