N O T E S T O P A G E S 3 8 - 4 9
78. Mitchell, “Air Power vs. Sea
Power,” American Review of Reviews,
LXIII (Mar. 19211, p. 273.
79. Mitchell, Our Air Force, p. 15.
80. Ibid., pp. 174ff.i and developed
further in his Winged Defense, pp. 10-11.
81. Mitchell, Our Air Force, p. 161.
82. Mitchell, “Our Army’s Air Serv-
83. Winged Defense, Introduction,
84. Ibid., p. vii.
85. Morrow Board, Hearings, p. 499;
Mitchell, “Airplanes in National De-
fense,” Annals of the American Acad-
emy of Political Science, Vol. 1 3 1 (May
ice,” p. 288.
pp. xv-xvi.
1927), 3&42*
86. lbid.
87. Ibid.
88. Morrow Board, Hearings, p. 499.
89. “Airplanes in National Defense,”
90. Winged Defense, p. 12.
91. Ibid., p. 216.
92. Ibid.
93. Ibid., p. 10.
94. Ibid., p. 12.
95. Ibid., p. 214.
96. Mitchell, Skyways (Philadelphia,
1930), pp. 271, 278.
97. Winged Defense, p. 16.
98. Skyways, p. 253.
99. Ibid., p. 255.
100. Ibid., p. 269.
1 0 1 . Ibid., p. 256.
102. Ibid., p. 269.
103. For an analysis and evaluation,
see Edward Warner, “Douhet, Mitchell,
Seversky: Theories of Air Warfare,” in
E.M. Earle, Makers of Modern Strategy
(Princeton, 19441, pp. 485-583.
104. Quoted by Brig. Gen. Hugh A.
Drum in Morrow Board, Hearings, p. 2 1 .
105. Report of the Secretary of W a r ,
1919, p. 70.
106. See, for example, his letter to
Menoher, Director of Air Service, 1 2
Jan. 1920, and his Final Report of 1 2
loc. cit.
674
Sept. 1924, both quoted in Morrow
Board, Hearings, pp. 2 3 , 25.
107. Field Service Regulations, U. S.
Army (Washington, 19241, p. 77.
108. Ibid.
109. Ibid., p. 1 1 .
1 1 0 . Ibid.
I I I . Ibid., pp. 22-23.
1 1 2 . Ibid., p. 2 2 .
113. lbid., p. 23.
I 14. See accompanying letter, ibid.,
1 1 5 . TR 440-15, Sec. I, 4.
116. lbid., I, 4; and 111, 14.
117. Air Service Tactical School,
Langley Field, Va., Bombardment
(Washington, 19261, p. 54.
118. Ibid., pp. 64, 72.
119. Ltr., Lt. Col. C.C. Culver, Comdt.
ACTS to C/AC, 30 Apr. 1928.
120. 1st ind. (ibid.), OCAC to Comdt.
ACTS, I Sept. 1928.
1 2 1 . The Air Force, pp. 50, 100,
quoted in Richard Stockton, Inevitable
W a r (New York, 19321, pp. 531-32.
122. Drum Board Report, quoted in
Baker Board, Final Report, pp. 11-15.
123. Ibid., p. 12.
124. J.B. No. 349 (Serial 539), 26
Sept. 1934.
125. Joint Action of the Army and
Navy, 1 1 Sept. 1935.
126. Ltr., Douglas MacArthur, C/S
to C G s of Armies, GHQAF, et ul.,
127. Quoted in memo for C/AC from
Brig. Gen. C.E. Kilbourne, AC/S, WPD,
2 1 Dec. 1934.
128. Submitted with memo cited
above.
129. Memo for Exec. OCAC from
Maj. Carl Spaatz, Chief, Training and
Operations Div., 5 p n . 1935; ACTS
Study of Proposed Air Corps Doctrine
Submitted by WPD, WDGS, 3 1 Jan.
‘935.
p. iii.
I7 O C t . 1934.
130. TR 44-15, Sec. nI,6.
131. Submitted with ACTS study, as
cited in n. 129.
132. Ibid.