N O T E S T O P A G E S 1 5 - 2 6
41. Final Report ..., A.E.F.
42. H.A. Jones, T h e W a r in the Air,
VI (Oxford, 1937), 1-27, 101-17, andsthe
pertinent documents in the appendices,
especially on p. 41.
9. M.M. Patrick, The United States
in the Air, P* I77.
10. Baker Board, Final Report,. p!ge
4, omits the American Aviation Misslon,
headed by Benedict Crowell, Assistant
Secretary of War, which reported on 19
July 1919.
1 1 . Quoted in AAF Historical Study
No. 25, Organization of Military Aero-
nautics, 1907-1935 (hereinafter cited as
I . Report of the Secretary of War, AAFHS-zf), p. 71.
12. Dwight W. Morrow, in Commit-
2. Aircraft: Hearings before the tee on Military Affairs, 1926, Hearings,
43. Toulmin, op. cit., chap. w.
NOTES TO CHAPTER 2
1919 (Washington, 1920), pp. 58-75.
President’s Aircraft Board (Washington,
1925) (hereinafter cited as Morrow 1 3 . Public No. 143 (63d Cong.).
14. AAFHS-25, pp. 36-38.Board, Hearings), p. 398.
3. Inquiry into Operations of the U.S.
Air Services: Hearing before Select
Committee of Inquiry into Operatiom of 16- Reports published in Committee
the U.S. Air Services, Home of Repre- on Military Affairs, 1926, Hearings:
sentatives (Washington, 1925) (herein- Dickman Board, PP. 952-57; Menoher
after cited as Lampert Committee, Board, PP. 9O8-’7.
Hearing), p. 2262. 17. AAFHS-25, pp. 38-40.
4. Department of Defense and Unifi- 1 8 . Public No. 242 (66th Cong.), in
cation of Air Service: Hearings before 41 Stat. 759-88. Fn respect to the dis-
the Committee on Military Affairs, position of the Crowell report, see the
House of Representatives (Washington, testimony of Howard E. Coffin, a mem-
1926) (hereinafter cited as Committee ber, in Lampert Committee, Hearing,
on Military Affairs, 1926, Hearings), p. 1 2 1 5 .
P* 476. 19. Report of the Secretary of War,
5. See, for example, the Final Report 2919, pp. 68-75.
of War Deparment Special Cf3’Wi.%ittee 20. Quoted in Isaac Don Levine,
On Army Air ‘934) Mitchell, Pioneer of Air Power, p. 317.
(hereinafter cited as Baker Board, Final
Report), p. 26.
before the Committee on Military Af-
fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William Mit-
ington, 19x9) (hereinafter cited as chell, Our Air Force: T h e Keystone of
Committee on Military Affairs, 1919, National Defense (New York, 192i),
Hearings), p. 932. chap. xiv; “Aviation over the Water,”
7. Committee on Military Affairs, American Review o f Reviews, LxII
1926, Hearings, p. 383. (Oct. 1920), 391-98; “Air Power vs. Sea
Power,” ibid., LXIII (Mar. 1921), 273-
8. Lampen Committee, Hearing, P. 78; “Has the Airplane Made the Battle-
2240; cf. pp. 2106, 22509 2 2 5 2 . A list of ship Obsolete?” World’s Work, XL
the Air Service officers testifying before ( A ~ ~ .1921); “Aircraft Dominate Sea-
the several committees would include craft. Saturday Evening post, 24 Jan.
many of the most ardent supporters of 1925,etc.
unification. (See also William Mitchell,
p. 830.
Ibid., p. 41.
2 1 . Morrow Board, Hearings, p. 497.
6. A m y Reorganization: Hearings 22. Levine, Mitchell, pages 401-5?gives
a bibliography Of his
Winged Defense: The Development m d
Possibilities of Modern Air Power-Eco-
24. Mitchell, Winged Defeme, PP’
41-41; Levinel Mitche”, chap. viii.
nomic and Military [New York, 19253,
p. 30.) 269-70.
25. Levine, Mitchell, chap. IX and p p
672