T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
tations among military staffs, so that the plans and operations of each
will fit into a general strategy designed to crush the enemy." 6 9
The vast amount of important business accomplished at ARCADIA
gave evidence of the utility of periodic meetings of government chiefs
with their principal military and civilian advisers. Hence there
followed, after the pattern set at the Atlantic conference and
ARCADIA, a series of meetings, from Casablanca to Potsdam, a t
which the major issues of the war were settled. In some of the con-
ferences, the Soviet Union, China, and other United Nations partici-
pated, but usually the function of the meetings was to serve as a
clearing house for Anglo-American plans. Ultimate decisions on major
military policies were taken by President Roosevelt, as Commander
in Chief of the U.S. forces, and by Mr. Churchill as British Prime
Minister and Minister of Defense. Each of those leaders was inclined
to assume a more active part in framing military strategy than was
conventional with civilian officials in their respective states, and it was
highly desirable that they be served by a common staff organization.
The basic elements for such a body existed already in the U.S. Joint
Board and the British Chiefs of Staff Committee, with their staff
organizations, but inasmuch as those bodies sat respectively a t Wash-
ington and London, some practical form of liaison was required. In
ABC-I it had been suggested that this be achieved by the exchange
of permanent military missions. The suggestion had been carried out
in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special Observer Group
in London and the British Joint Staff Mission in Washington." There
remained the task of perfecting this initial machinery, including the
subsidiary staff agencies, and of regularizing procedures. These goals
were achieved during the weeks following the Washington confer-
ence, and during the same period significant changes occurred in the
organization and command structure of the armed forces of the
United States. T o some extent the latter changes were brought about
by conditions peculiar to the U.S. services, but they were profoundly
influenced by the new Anglo-American staff organization. And in
each case the status of the AAF was improved.
In consonance with their previously declared interest, the British
chiefs of staff on 10 January presented to their American opposite
numbers a memorandum on post-ARCADIA c~llaboration.~~The
paper, suggesting the establishment of a permanent staff organization,
was discussed in detail, revised by the U.S. chiefs of staff, and at the
2 5 2