Documents / Report

Sky Canada Project report (PDF)

Office of the Chief Science Advisor, Government of Canada · 2025 · 30 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Office of the Chief Science Advisor of Canada issued this June 2025 report of the Sky Canada Project, which reviewed how public reports of unidentified aerial phenomena are handled in Canada. It finds no cohesive, standardized reporting system, no official public platform, limited analysis and little scientific involvement. It compares approaches in the United States, France and Chile, includes a commissioned public survey, and makes fourteen recommendations, including naming a lead federal agency, creating a dedicated reporting service and cooperating with AARO, NASA, GEIPAN and SEFAA.

  • p. 2 …Evolving Terminology and Broadened Scope 14 Science and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life: Promising Scientific Approaches…
  • p. 7 …The project was not meant to prove or disprove the existence of extraterrestrial life or extraterrestrial…
  • p. 8 …Science and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life: Promising Scientific Approaches No extraterrestrial life has been detected…
  • p. 9 …The search for extraterrestrial life involves several fields, in- cluding astronomy, biology and planetary science, and…
  • p. 20 …During the 1990s, interest in UAPs and extraterrestrial life surged as state media began covering the…
  • p. 24 …Celestial objects Foreign governments∕spies Aliens∕Extraterrestrial life Don't Know∕No Response Chart 5: What…
  • p. 26 …Over the course of your life, have you ever seen an object or phenomenon in the…
  • p. 29 …Out-There-Two-Three-Canadians-Believe- Alien-Life. 4 Groupe d’Etude et d’Information sur…
Chart 2: How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement:
“UAPs represent an issue for flight safety in Canada”?
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't Know∕No Response
Nearly 40% of respondents consider that UAPs represent
a flight safety issue.
10% 29% 22% 12% 11% 15%
Source: Earnscliffe, 2024
Chart 3: How strongly do you agree or disagree with the statement:
“The nature of some UAPs has not been confirmed”?
Over half (55%) of Canadian respondents agree that the
nature of some UAPs has not been confirmed.
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't Know∕No Response
23% 16%32% 19% 5% 5%
Source: Earnscliffe, 2024
Chart 4: How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of
the following statements?
I believe there is
false information
about UAPs in
social media
I believe there is
false information
about UAPs in
mainstream media
The majority of respondents believe that there is false information about
UAPs in social media and mainstream media.
Source: Earnscliffe, 2024
Strongly agree
Somewhat agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Somewhat disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't Know∕No Response
36% 11%30% 16% 4%3%
23% 15%32% 21% 5% 4%
Only a minority of respondents
pointed to a possible source
of UAPs.
Source: Earnscliffe, 2024Nothing
Other
Military
Government/federal government
Drones∕Satellites∕Aircraft∕Weather balloons
Natural phenomena∕Weather∕Celestial objects
Foreign governments∕spies
Aliens∕Extraterrestrial life
Don't Know∕No Response
Chart 5: What do you think is behind, or the source, of UAPs?
71%
10%
6%
5%
5%
4%
3%
3%
1%

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 30 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.