Documents / Report

Robertson Panel Report

The Black Vault · 1953 · 29 pages · text from the file's own layer

This declassified CIA document, released through The Black Vault, reports on the meetings of the Scientific Advisory Panel on Unidentified Flying Objects, which the Office of Scientific Intelligence convened on January 14 to 18, 1953. It includes a history of the sessions and the panel's informal comments, and it appends the formal report signed by H. P. Robertson and others. The panel found no evidence of a direct threat to national security. It recommended stripping UFOs of their special status and starting a public education program.

  • p. 9 …CIA-RDP81R00560R.100030027-0 ·~ :g~·~~ ~M~n conclusions reached. A general discussion followed and tentative reconnnendations…
  • p. 10 …COM~·:lENTS A.TID SUGGESTIONS OF PANEL GENERAL The Panel Members -vrere impressed (as have been…
  • p. 12 …a possible educational program are enumerated belmv ~ ~~w ~-!}~ Approved For Release 2001/08/07: G.~.:RDP81R00560R000100030027…
  • p. 16 …remely high speed in small orbital paths. g. Apparent lack of guidance of investigators by those…
  • p. 17 …The long delay in explaining a sighting tends to eliminate any intelligence value. The educational or…
  • p. 22 …felt such a technical solution was simpler and would cost much less than a "Doppler filter…
  • p. 23 Approved Fo.:l:a.se 2001/08/07: CIA-RDP81R005.00100030027-0 ~~~tijt~"'m.J!I…
  • p. 24 …CIA-RDP81R00560R.00030027-0 W•ms mentioned as possibly a valuable channel of communication reachin.o…
  • p. 25 …An astronomic2.l consultant g. A Gro·t p LeaO.er, Hith ac'ministrative assist::'nt…
Approved For Re.se 2001/08/07: CIA-RDP81R00560R~00030027-0
··•"""'$liiit:tl~~~'1~~,,.,,"""'"">:50 'E'""e""rf'" ,. '"· ·">If<·
~&:~).~
1000 man-hours of professional and sub-professional time in the
preparation of graph plots of individual frames of the film, show-
ing apparent and relative motion of objects and variation in their
light intensity. It was the opinion of the P.I.L. representatives
that the objects sighted were not birds, balloons or aircraft, were
nnot reflections because there 1ras no blinking while passing through
60° of arc" and were, therefore, 11self-luminous". Plots of motion
and variation in light intensity of the objects were displayed,
While the Panel Members were impressed by the evident enthusiasm,
industry and extent of effort of the P.I.L. team, they could not
accept the conclusions reached. Some of the reasons for this were
as follows: •
a. A semi-spherical object can readily produce a reflection
of sunlight without ''blinking" through 60° of arc travel.
b. Although no data was available on the ttalbedo" of birds or
polyethylene ballons in bright sunlight, the apparent
motions, sizes and brightnesses of the objects vrere
considered strongly to suggest birds, particularly after
the Panel viewed a short film sho\nng high reflectivity
of seagulls in bright sunlight.
c. P.I.L. description of the objects sighted as "circular,
bluish-white" in color would be expected in cases of
spectacular reflections of sunlight from convex surfaces
where the brilliance of the reflection would obscure other
portions of the object.
~~.!lW'~fllli:!-<t~
-"D"""'·l5't-"C"' "l'f',..l!i "'"''!"~~~..,.,.~ ..
.-~~..~~~.~~~·~·~1\ "'' .. ·. •.• -
Approved For Release 2001/08/07 :-efA--RDP81R00560R000100030027-0

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 29 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.