Documents / Official release

Final Personnel Record for Newhouse, Delbert C., U.S. Navy, 1957

U.S. Department of War · 1957-05-02 · 585 pages · text by OCR, confidence 98%

From the source:Release of 2026-09-18 Incident: 5/2/57, N/A. This file contains the final personnel record of U.S. Navy Chief Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse, who left naval service as a Chief Warrant Officer 4, then the highest Warrant Officer grade. In July 1952, Newhouse recorded 16mm motion-picture film near Tremonton, Utah; the film later became the subject of a Project Blue Book investigation. Project Blue Book was the U.S. Air Force program active from 1952 to 1969 that investigated the nature and origin of unidentified flying objects (UFOs). In addition to documenting routine assignments and training, the file records Newhouse’s career progression as a Photographer’s Mate, a Navy enlisted specialty responsible for photography and related imaging work. Project Blue Book investigators characterized Newhouse as an expert photographer based on his naval experience.

DOW-UAP-PR159 · video · 1952-07-02 Historical Film of Reported UFOs, Utah, 1952 This archival footage is a digitization of a 16mm print of Kodachrome color motion-picture film shot on a handheld Bell & Howell Auto Master camera near Tremonton, Utah, on July 2, 1952. U.S. Navy Chief Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse reported observing and filming a group of bright airborne objects and shortly thereafter submitted the footage to the U.S. Air Force. The film later became one of the visual cases reviewed by Project Blue Book, the 1952–1969 U.S. Air Force program that investigated the nature and origin of unidentified flying objects (UFOs). The film’s limited detail and lack of fixed reference points prevented a conclusive resolution. From the 55-second mark onward, the film transitions to unrelated footage appearing to show a demonstration of sewing equipment. The presence of unrelated sewing-equipment footage suggests that the surviving footage may be a composite or reused print, though the available record does not establish how or when the materials came to be combined. As documented in records submitted with the film, contained in this collection under the title DOW-UAP-D102, the footage originally was paired with mountain scenery from Idaho, which is not preserved in this digitization. Download (76.1 MB)
NAVPER-310 (REV. 3-54) OCT 21 1959 V REPORT ON THE FITNESS OF OFFICERS THE OFFICER REPORTED ON WILL FILL IN THE FIRST ELEVEN SECTIONS: 1. NAME (Last) (First) (Middle) 2. GRADE 3. USN (R) 4. DESIGNATOR 5. FILE NO. NEWHOUSE, Delbert Clement CWO4 USN 8311 177283 6. SHIP OR STATION USS ESSEX (CVA-9) 7. DATE REPORTED PRESENT DUTY STATION 10 January 1958 8. OCCASION FOR REPORT SEMI-ANNUAL ☑ DETACHMENT OF REPORTING SENIOR ☐ DETACHMENT OF OFFICER ☐ 9. TYPE OF REPORT REGULAR ☑ CON-CURRENT ☐ SPECIAL ☐ 10. PERIOD OF REPORT FROM 11-20-58 TO 5-31-59 11. DUTIES. List principal duties assigned including watches, and indicate in parentheses after each the number of months during the reporting period. If assignment is in other than regular Navy billet or involves duties not well established, give outline of purpose, scope, and significance of such duties. If necessary, use separate sheet and attach to this form. Photographic Officer (5) Ast. OP DIV Officer (5) Operations Department Duty Officer (5) FOLLOWING TO BE FILLED IN BY THE REPORTING OFFICER: Signature of officer reported on: *D. Newhouse* 12. EMPLOYMENT OF COMMAND DURING PERIOD OF THIS REPORT Leave and Upkeep, Mayport, Fla.; Shipyard Overhaul, Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, Va.; INTEX 1-59 13. REFERENCE HERE AND APPEND ANY COMMENDABLE OR ADVERSE REPORTS ON THIS OFFICER RECEIVED DURING THE PERIOD OF THIS REPORT None 14. PERFORMANCE OF DUTIES (In comparison with other officers of his grade and approximate length of service, consider the requirements of his duties and evaluate his performance.) DUTY ASSIGNMENT NOT OBSERVED Outstanding performance in most aspects of his duty assignments. Highly qualified. Excellent performance in most aspects of his duty assignments. Efficient or competent in most of the remaining aspects. Frequently demonstrates outstanding performance. Competent and efficient performance in most aspects of his duty assignments. Frequently demonstrates excellent performance. Satisfactory performance in most aspects of his duty assignments. Needs some supervision. Basically qualified. Inadequate performance in many aspects of his duty assignments. Needs close supervision. He is not qualified. (Adverse) (a) Present Assignment X (b) As OPS DIV Watch Officer X (c) Collateral Duties X (d) Technical Specialty Photo X (e) Ship Handling X (f) In Administration X (g) Ability to Command X (h) As Executive or Division Officer X (i) Duty on a Staff X (j) Other X 15. Considering the possible requirements of war, indicate your attitude toward having this officer under your command. Would you: Particularly desire to have him? ☐ Prefer him to most? ☐ Be pleased to have him? ☑ Be satisfied to have him? ☐ Prefer not to have him? (Adverse) ☐ 16. (a) In comparison with other officers of his grade and approximate length of service, how would you designate this officer? (b) For this report period indicate in (b) how many officers of his grade you have designated in each category of (a). One of the few highly outstanding officers I know A very fine officer of great value to the service A dependable and typically effective officer An acceptable officer Unsatisfactory (Adverse) (a) X (b) 2 17. COMMENTS. In this section it is important that the outstanding characteristics of the officer, and any weaknesses which seriously affect his performance of duty, be reported. The appraisal should be concise and concrete in terms of specific examples of performance from which the more general factors can be inferred. The appraisal will justify the marks assigned in Items 14, 15, and 16, above. In addition, the appraisal should include outstanding qualifications in any field such as the following: administration, planning, logistics, electronics, new weapons, and in dealing with the public in personal or official contacts. This space must not be left blank. CWO NEWHOUSE has performed his assigned duties in a competent manner. He is an excellent photographer. As OP junior division officer he has demonstrated average leadership ability. His military bearing and dress are above average. 18. NAME, GRADE, AND FILE NUMBER OF REPORTING OFFICER. OFFICIAL STATUS RELATIVE TO OFFICER REPORTED ON. T. W. SOUTH II, Captain, 73643, Commanding Officer 16-70109-1 Note: The handwritten signature "D. Newhouse" is transcribed as such. The stamp "Finished File Parts 1-4" and "Fitness Report" are noted in the top right corner but not included in the main content as they are marginalia. The redacted areas are not present in the provided image. The table structure is preserved with appropriate column headers and content. The checkboxes are represented with ☑ for checked and ☐ for unchecked. The handwritten text in the signature line is transcribed as "D. Newhouse" based on the visible script. The footer source URL is included as per the original document.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model (mean confidence 98%); expect the odd misread word. 585 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.