Documents / Document

Project Condign (DEFE 24/2090)

Internet Archive (DocumentCloud mirror of Telegraph upload) · 160 pages · text by OCR

This MoD file, titled UFOs - Persistent Correspondence - Dr David Clarke, holds Dr David Clarke's Freedom of Information requests and emails to the Directorate of Air Staff from 2005 to 2008. Clarke asked for the DI55 report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region and for Rendlesham papers. He also sought records about Nick Pope. Other items include an internal review that released redacted passages on plasmas, the MoD's statement that it had no report of the 2008 South Wales police helicopter sighting, and a 2009 disposal form.

  • p. 14 …By contrast, information which is about someone acting in an official or work capacity should normally…
  • p. 18 …Volume 2, Working Paper 5, page 5-1, paragraph 1. The sentence "The incidence of visual…
  • p. 22 …within the sixty working day period, your requests will be combined and work to process your…
  • p. 31 …43 should be cited. - In Volume 2, working paper no. 5. Page 5-3, paragraph 9…
  • p. 33 …wording in brackets which refers to the work of DI51. This should be redacted under s…
  • p. 34 …be stated as such. - In Volume 2, working paper no. 5. Page 5-3, paragraph 9…
  • p. 38 …be stated as such. - In Volume 2, working paper no. 5. Page 5-3, paragraph 9…
  • p. 46 …It is for these reasons that we have taken the decision to do no further work…
  • p. 49 …to have got forgotten while we were working on many requests, including the UAP report. I…
  • p. 51 …to have got forgotten while we were working on many requests, including the UAP report. I…
  • p. 54 …to have got forgotten while we were working on many requests, including the UAP report. I…
  • p. 60 …to have got forgotten while we were working on many requests, including the UAP report. I…
  • p. 71 …The author was initially employed as a contractor and commenced work on the report in December…
  • p. 77 …relations with other countries by disclosing their work on UAPs and related programmes. 11. In anticipation…
  • p. 78 …in case they were useful to the work of the Defence Intelligence Staff. During a policy…
  • p. 82 …Friday, 28 April, to spend two days working at the British Library. Assuming the report is…
  • p. 85 …look forward to hearing from you when work on the document is completed (hopefully soon). Please…
  • p. 86 …He was a contractor working for a private company, who was temporarily employed by the MOD…
  • p. 87 …He was a contractor working for a private company, who was temporary employed by the MOD…
  • p. 88 …not the case the private company he worked for must be known and contactable. Other than…
  • p. 89 …not the case the private company he worked for must be known and contactable. Other than…
  • p. 91 …Redact "Section 40 ## Volume 2 Working Paper No.5, Page 5-1, Paragraph 1 – Redact from…
  • p. 95 …While I am aware of the sensitivity of the work of the DIS, I would point…
  • p. 96 …The author was initially employed as a contractor and commenced work on the report in December…
  • p. 99 …52 ## Flying Saucer Working Party - minutes, memos and final report Flying Saucer Working Party - minutes, memos…
  • p. 110 …While I am aware of the sensitivity of the work of the DIS, I would point…
  • p. 113 …In the meantime, thanks again for all the work you have put into processing this substantial…
  • p. 114 …With regard to Volume 2 - Working Paper 9 (low flying charts) my colleagues in Low Flying…
  • p. 116 …it clearly involved a considerable amount of work. I gather from the documents already released that…
  • p. 118 …early January once we have done the work. Section 40 welcome to come of course. Please…
  • p. 119 …and will not be possible within 20 working days or within the £600 limit. We therefore…
  • p. 124 …Unlike the Flying Saucer Working Party report which was over 50 years old when released, this…
  • p. 127 …8) The release of the final report of the DGSTI Flying Saucer Working Report No.7…
  • p. 141 …Had to stop to do some real work. ## Section From: Section 40 Sent: 03 November 2005…
  • p. 144 …A decision has been made not to carry out any further work on the subject. The…
  • p. 148 …I am working on a post-doctoral project at the University of Sheffield which is examining…
relevant exemption. This test has been applied and it has been decided that the balance of public interest lies in maintaining the exemption and therefore withholding disclosure. Although we appreciate that disclosure of this information would have provided more background information on the UAP report, disclosure would reveal details of a particular company who has had contracts with the DIS which, if disclosed, would be likely to prejudice current and future commercial relations between the company concerned and the Ministry of Defence. You will also notice that some minor details have been removed, these consist of office addresses, telephone numbers and unique job titles. This information is not considered relevant to the contents of the report and we believe its removal does not prejudice the understanding of the report.

If you are unhappy with our decision to withhold this information, or you wish to complain about any aspect of the handling of this request, then you should contact the undersigned in the first instance. Should you remain dissatisfied, then you may apply for an internal review by contacting the Director of Information Exploitation, 6th Floor, MOD Main Building, Whitehall, SW1A 2HB (e-mail: Info-XD@mod.uk).

If you are still unhappy following an internal review, you may take your complaint to the Information Commissioner under the provisions of Section 50 of the Freedom of Information Act. Please note that the Information Commissioner will not normally investigate your case until the MOD internal review process has been completed. Further details of the role and powers of the Information Commissioner can be found on the Commissioner's website, http://www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk.

As requested, we have also reviewed the letter D/DIST/11/10 dated 4th December 2000 to see whether previously withheld information can now be released. As you will be aware, this document was released in response to your earlier FOI request concerning the DIS decision to no longer receive UFO reports. Paragraph 3 and a few words in paragraph 4 were removed because they were not relevant to that request. Given your subsequent FOI request for a copy of the UAP report and its release, we have reviewed this decision and decided that this information can now be released. The classification previously removed at the top and bottom of the letter can also now be revealed, but have been over-stamped to reflect the fact that the document has been downgraded. Please find enclosed a fresh copy of this document with this information revealed. The details of the author of the letter are still covered by FOIA Absolute exemption S.40 and therefore remain redacted.

Finally, with regard to your email of 13 June 2006 in which you asked about UFO file releases at The National Archives, I should inform you that once files are transferred from the MOD it is for the TNA to manage their release. The last two collections TNA made of MOD records in March and May 2006 did not include any pieces which obviously contain UFO information, nor any for DEFE 24 where future such releases are anticipated. I understand that TNA will be holding a press event at the end of June when they will highlight some of the new releases. All newly released records should also appear in their catalogue around this time.

Yours sincerely,

Section 40

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 160 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.