Documents / Document

Project Condign (DEFE 24/2090)

Internet Archive (DocumentCloud mirror of Telegraph upload) · 160 pages · text by OCR

This MoD file, titled UFOs - Persistent Correspondence - Dr David Clarke, holds Dr David Clarke's Freedom of Information requests and emails to the Directorate of Air Staff from 2005 to 2008. Clarke asked for the DI55 report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region and for Rendlesham papers. He also sought records about Nick Pope. Other items include an internal review that released redacted passages on plasmas, the MoD's statement that it had no report of the 2008 South Wales police helicopter sighting, and a 2009 disposal form.

  • p. 14 …By contrast, information which is about someone acting in an official or work capacity should normally…
  • p. 18 …Volume 2, Working Paper 5, page 5-1, paragraph 1. The sentence "The incidence of visual…
  • p. 22 …within the sixty working day period, your requests will be combined and work to process your…
  • p. 31 …43 should be cited. - In Volume 2, working paper no. 5. Page 5-3, paragraph 9…
  • p. 33 …wording in brackets which refers to the work of DI51. This should be redacted under s…
  • p. 34 …be stated as such. - In Volume 2, working paper no. 5. Page 5-3, paragraph 9…
  • p. 38 …be stated as such. - In Volume 2, working paper no. 5. Page 5-3, paragraph 9…
  • p. 46 …It is for these reasons that we have taken the decision to do no further work…
  • p. 49 …to have got forgotten while we were working on many requests, including the UAP report. I…
  • p. 51 …to have got forgotten while we were working on many requests, including the UAP report. I…
  • p. 54 …to have got forgotten while we were working on many requests, including the UAP report. I…
  • p. 60 …to have got forgotten while we were working on many requests, including the UAP report. I…
  • p. 71 …The author was initially employed as a contractor and commenced work on the report in December…
  • p. 77 …relations with other countries by disclosing their work on UAPs and related programmes. 11. In anticipation…
  • p. 78 …in case they were useful to the work of the Defence Intelligence Staff. During a policy…
  • p. 82 …Friday, 28 April, to spend two days working at the British Library. Assuming the report is…
  • p. 85 …look forward to hearing from you when work on the document is completed (hopefully soon). Please…
  • p. 86 …He was a contractor working for a private company, who was temporarily employed by the MOD…
  • p. 87 …He was a contractor working for a private company, who was temporary employed by the MOD…
  • p. 88 …not the case the private company he worked for must be known and contactable. Other than…
  • p. 89 …not the case the private company he worked for must be known and contactable. Other than…
  • p. 91 …Redact "Section 40 ## Volume 2 Working Paper No.5, Page 5-1, Paragraph 1 – Redact from…
  • p. 95 …While I am aware of the sensitivity of the work of the DIS, I would point…
  • p. 96 …The author was initially employed as a contractor and commenced work on the report in December…
  • p. 99 …52 ## Flying Saucer Working Party - minutes, memos and final report Flying Saucer Working Party - minutes, memos…
  • p. 110 …While I am aware of the sensitivity of the work of the DIS, I would point…
  • p. 113 …In the meantime, thanks again for all the work you have put into processing this substantial…
  • p. 114 …With regard to Volume 2 - Working Paper 9 (low flying charts) my colleagues in Low Flying…
  • p. 116 …it clearly involved a considerable amount of work. I gather from the documents already released that…
  • p. 118 …early January once we have done the work. Section 40 welcome to come of course. Please…
  • p. 119 …and will not be possible within 20 working days or within the £600 limit. We therefore…
  • p. 124 …Unlike the Flying Saucer Working Party report which was over 50 years old when released, this…
  • p. 127 …8) The release of the final report of the DGSTI Flying Saucer Working Report No.7…
  • p. 141 …Had to stop to do some real work. ## Section From: Section 40 Sent: 03 November 2005…
  • p. 144 …A decision has been made not to carry out any further work on the subject. The…
  • p. 148 …I am working on a post-doctoral project at the University of Sheffield which is examining…
## Section 40

From: Section 40

ENCLOSURE

MUMBER

Sent: 16 December 2005 11:50

To: Section 40

Subject: RE: FOI Request - Dr David Clarke

## Dear Section 40

Thank you for your email. I believe Section 40 has been in touch with you about the first point.

I am very happy for you to continue to correspond with Dr Clarke as DAS are the policy lead and you have established a relationship already. It's best that he has one POC in MOD!

On the redaction points, Section 40 has already checked the first two volumes from a security/technical perspective, and has agreed to redact Vol 3 which does need some technical data redacted. Section 40 be checking them from an FOI perspective. For example, we have seen some references to other nations, which might need redacting. We hope to have completed this task by early January.

As it will be a one-off publication, creating a new class under the publication scheme may be unnecessary. Instead of placing the reports on the MOD's publication scheme, we could place them in the MOD's FOI Reading Room which is available at the www.mod.uk website. Info-Access views would be welcome.

I am happy to host a meeting here in early January once we have done the work. Section 40 welcome to come of course. Please ring me if you have any other points.

Have a good (UFO-free) Christmas! Section 40

Section 40

DI BCR CG AD

Section 40

From: Section 40

Sent: 15 December 2005 12:09

To: Section 40

Cc:

Subject: RE: FOI Request - Dr David Clarke

## Dear Section 40

Thank you for this. I thought Section 40 was your FOI focal point and have copied my e-mails to her, so I apologise for sending them to the wrong place. I will deal with Section 40 future.

All of the information Dr Clarke has asked for in this request is DIS material and not held by DAS. However, Dr Clarke has been corresponding with me about UFOs almost continuously for over 5 years and we have released a lot of information to him. In order to stop him starting a similar long chain of correspondence with yourselves and so I can keep track of what information he has been given I thought it best that your response comes through me rather than directly to him. If you would prefer to correspond directly with him, please let me know. Otherwise I believe that you are best placed to decide on what can be released from these documents (with the input of any other parties as you see fit) and the use of any exemptions. You would then need to redact any information which is to be withheld. As the FOIA is an entitlement to information not documents it would be acceptable to provide a digest of releasable information but given the number of documents involved it may be more practical to provide copies (redacted where necessary). I would then be

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 160 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.