Documents / Report

Project Blue Book Special Report (second copy)

Internet Archive · 309 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14, "Analysis of Reports of Unidentified Aerial Objects," Project No. 10073, dated 5 May 1955. The study reduced about 4,000 sighting reports received by the U.S. Air Force between June 1947 and December 1952 to IBM punched cards and analyzed them statistically, including chi square tests comparing knowns with unknowns. It concludes that the reports very probably do not represent technological developments beyond present scientific knowledge, and it notes that no case produced physical evidence.

  • p. 7 …Air Force on unidentified aerial objects were reduced to IBM punched-card abstracts of the data…
  • p. 10 …form suit- able for transfer to IBM punched cards was extremely difficult ""and time consuming. For…
  • p. 14 …Thus, the selection of the IBM punched- card system for analysis of data forced the adoption…
  • p. 18 …Multiple punching elirninated the need to use several columns for discrete expression of the variations., Selection…
  • p. 22 …counting, and tabulating the information from the punched-card abstracts of reports of sightings. It was…
  • p. 23 f m translation and transcription from reports to punched cards, indicated that there would be relatively…
  • p. 63 …cosines, and tangents of angles had been punched for each 0.01 of a degree from…
  • p. 68 …These group numbers were punched on the cards and incorporated into the coding system. The number…
  • p. 296 Observer's Data Sheet Question WORK SHEET Punched Card Column Code Description 2 3 h Serial…
  • p. 297 Observer's Data Sheet Question Punched Card Column Code Description 6. 7. a. 1 0 . Ui…
  • p. 299 …If no data are available for any column, the Y (or 12 punch) should be used…
  • p. 300 …Air Force Technical Information Sheet Question Punched Card Column Code Description I. f? • f V : HIT…
  • p. 306 …Air Force Technical Information Sheet Question Punched Card Column Code Description 1. 1 2 k 12…
  • p. 307 …Air Force Technical Information Sheet Question Punched Card Column Code Description 3o hi U6 75* 76…
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
SUMMARY • vii
1
INTRODUCTION 1
ORIGIN AND NATURE OF DATA 3
REDUCTION OF DATA TO MECHANIZED COMPUTATION FORM 4
Questionnaire 4
Coding System and Work Sheet 6
Identification of Working Papers 7
Evaluation of Individual Reports - 10
ANALYSIS OF THE DATA 14
Frequency and Percentage Distributions by Characteristics 14
Graphical Presentation 16
Advanced Study of the Data 16
Position of the Sun Relative to the Observer 16
Statistical Chi Square Test . 60
The "Flying Saucer" Model 76
CONCLUSIONS 94
APPENDIX A. TABULATION OF FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE
DISTRIBUTIONS BY CHARACTERISTICS . . . . 95
APPENDIX B. WORKING PAPER FORMS 255
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure 1 Frequency of Sightings by Year for Object, Unit, and All Sightings 17
Figure 2 Distribution of Evaluations of Object, Unit, and All Sightings for All Years 18
Figure 3 Distribution of Object Sightings by Evaluation for All Years With Comparisons
of Each Year for Each Evaluation Group 19
Figure 4 Distribution of Object Sightings by Evaluation for All Years and Each Year 20
Figure 5 Distribution of Object Sightings by Evaluation Within Months for All Years 21
Figure 6 Distribution of Object Sightings by Certain and Doubtful Evaluations for
All Years and Each Year 22
Figure 7 Frequency of Object Sightings and Unknown Object Evaluations by
Months, 1947-1952 23
Figure 8 Distribution of Object Sightings by Sighting Reliability Groups With
Evaluation Distributions for Each Group 24
Figure 9 Distribution of Object Sightings Among the Four. Sighting Reliability
Groups for All Years and Each Year 25
Figure 10 Distribution of All Sightings by Sighting Reliability Groups, Segregated
by Military and Civilian Observers, With Evaluation Distribution
for Each Segregation 26
Figure 11 Distribution of Object Sightings by Reported Colors of Object(s) With
Evaluation Distribution for Each Color Group 27
Figure 12 Distribution of Object Sightings by Number of Objects Seen per Sighting.
With Evaluation Distribution for Each Group . . . . . . . 28
Figure 13 Distribution of Object Sightings by Duration of Sighting With Evaluation
Distribution for Each Duration Group . , 29
111

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 309 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.