Documents / Document

Package compiled for FAA managers

FAA via National Archives / The Black Vault · 122 pages · text from the file's own layer

This package was compiled by the FAA Alaskan Region Public Affairs Office in Anchorage and sent to FAA managers with a memo from Paul Steucke dated March 5, 1987. It gathers material on the November 17, 1986 sighting by the crew of Japan Air Lines flight 1628: a news release, pilot and controller transcripts, crew interviews and radar analysis. The FAA concluded that it could not confirm the event. It attributed the second radar target to a split, uncorrelated return from the JAL Boeing 747 and planned no further investigation.

  • p. 12 …Steucke said, "The controllers were doing their job right because they have to work with what…
  • p. 17 …it, but one of the people that work for me, I'm the office manager over…
  • p. 24 …Terauchi Working good R. Gordon Good, (laughter) F. Fujii Now how about communications, naviagion, or interferring…
  • p. 67 …this period of time when you were working with ••• T. Tamefuji Oh yeah, hurnmm P. Beckner…
  • p. 80 …I was working the R/Dl5 position from 0156 UTC, November 18, 1986 to 0230 UTC…
  • p. 81 …I was working the Dl5 position f r om 0156 UTC, November 18, 1986 to 0230…
  • p. 83 …I was working the Dl5 position from 0230 UTC, November 18, 1986, to 0530 UTC, November…
  • p. 84 …I was working the El position from 0006 UTC, November 18, 1986 to 0425 UTC, November…
  • p. 85 …1986, to 0900 UTC, November 18, I was working the Area Manager 18, 1986, to 0900…
  • p. 92 INSPECTION AND SURVEILLANCE RECORD 1. WORK A CT IV ITY • 2. UNI 3. HOURS Ille 1…
  • p. 93 INSPECTION AND SURVEILLANCE RECORD I. WORK ACTIVITY 2. UHl T:i . HOURS 4. NAME ANO ADDRESS…
  • p. 96 INSPECTION AHO SURVEILLANCE RECORD 1. WORK ACTIVITY '·NAME AMO AOORESS 01" CARRIER, OPERATOR, AIRPORT, AGENCY, OR…
  • p. 105 …Position Logs. (Record of which employees were working each position at what time.) (2 pages) Anchorage…
  • p. 108 …Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group; Rebecca Osborne and Catherine Scott, IBM; Karen Griggs…
  • p. 109 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files Author Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative (FADGI) - Still Image Working Group…
  • p. 110 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group - August 201 o Table of Contents SCOPE ............................................................................................................................ 2…
  • p. 111 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group -August 201 O Image Processing ....................................................................................................................................................... 47 Color Correction…
  • p. 112 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group - August 2010 Meta-Metadata ....... ..... ............. ........... ..... ..... .... .... .. .... ........... ...... ........ ... ..... ... .. .... ......... .. ..... ...... ... ..... .......... ... ....... 76 Assessment ofMetadata Needs…
  • p. 113 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group - August 201 o I. INTRODUCTION Context The Technical…
  • p. 114 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group -August 2010 ln general, master files have the…
  • p. 115 - Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group -August 2010 II. TECHNICAL OVERVIEW Raster Image Characteristics…
  • p. 116 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group -August 2010 printing images all render high-bit…
  • p. 117 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group -August 2010 Viewing Conditions A variety of factors…
  • p. 118 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group - August 201 O temperature may also be necessary…
  • p. 119 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group - August 2010 Future work of the Still Image…
  • p. 120 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group - August 2010 r~ ·~~ .D Q) ~~ ~I Q) l…
  • p. 121 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group - August 2010 - SIGNAL - "' SFR - Spatial Frequency Response - ( ISO…
  • p. 122 Federal Agencies Digitization In itiative Still Image Working Group -August 20 10 - NOISE- Engineering - Radiometric Distortion…
-
Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group -August 2010
II. TECHNICAL OVERVIEW
Raster Image Characteristics
Spatial Resolution
Spatial resolution detennines the amount of infonnation in a raster image file in terms of the number of picture
elements or pixels per unit of measurement, but it does not define or guarantee the quality of the information. Spatial
resolution defines how finely or widely spaced the individual pixels are from each other. The higher the spatial
resolution, the more finely spaced and the higher the number of pixels overall. The lower the spatial resolution, the
more widely spaced and the fewer the number of pixels overall.
Spatial resolution is measured as pixels per inch or PP! ; pixels per millimeter or pixels per centimeter are also used.
Resolution is often referred to as dots per inch or DPI. In common usage, the te1ms PPI and DPI are used
interchangeably. Since raster image files are composed of pixels, technically PPI is a more accurate term and is used
in this document (one example in support of using the PPI term is that Adobe Photoshop software uses the pixels per
inch terminology). DP! is the appropriate tem1 for describing printer resolution (actual dots vs. pixels); however,
DP! is used often in scanning and image processing software to refer to spatial resolution and this usage is an
understandable convention .
The spatial resolution and the image dimensions detennine the total number of pixels in the image; an 8"xl0"
photograph scanned at I 00 ppi produces an image that has 800 pixels by 1000 pixels or a total of 800,000 pixels.
The numbers ofrows and columns of pixels, or the height and width of the image in pixels as described in the
previous sentence, is known as the pixel array. When specifying a desired file size, it is always necessary to provide
both the resolution and the image dimensions ; ex. 300 ppi at S"x 1O" or even 300 ppi at original size.
The image file size, in tenns of data storage, is proportional to the spatial resolution (the higher the resolution, the
larger the file size for a set document size) and to the size of the document being scanned (the larger the document,
the larger the file size for a set spatial resolution). Increasing resolution increases the total number of pixels,
resulting in a larger image file . Scanning larger documents produces more pixels resulting in larger image files .
Higher spatial resolution provides more pixels, and generally will render more fine detail of the original in the
digital image, but not always. The actual rendition of fine detail is more dependent on the spatial frequency response
SFR) of the scanner or digital camera (see Quantifying Sca1mer/Digital Camera Performance below), the image
processing applied, and the characteristics of the item being scanned. Also, depending on the intended usage of the
master files. there may be a practical limit to how much fine detail is actually needed .
Signal Resolution
Bit-depth or signal resolution, sometimes called tonal resolution, defines the maximum number of shades and/or
colors in a digital image file , but does not define or guarantee the quality of the information.
In a I-bit file each pixel is represented by a single binary digit (either a 0 or I), so the pixel can be either black or
white. There are only two possible combinations or 2 1 = 2.
The common standard for grayscale and color images is to use 8-bits (eight binary digits representing each pixel) of
data per channel and this provides a maximum of 256 shades per channel ranging from black to white; 2s = 256
possible combinations of zeroes and ones.
High-bit or 16-bits ( 16 binary digits representing each pixel) per channel images can have a greater number of
shades compared to 8-bit per channel images, a maximum of over 65,000 shades vs. 256 shades; 21 6 - 65,536
possible combinations of zeroes and ones.
Well done 8-bits per channel imaging will meet most needs - with a limited ability for major corrections,
transfom1ations , and re-purposing. Gross corrections of 8-bit per channel images may cause shades to drop out of
the image, creating a posterization effect due to the 1imited number of shades.
High-bit images can match the effective shading and density range of photographic originals (assuming the scanner
is actually able to caphtre the information), and, due to the greater shading (compared to 8-bits per channel), may be
beneficial when re-purposing images and when working with images that need major or excessive adjustments to the
tone distribution and/or color balance. However, at this time, monitors for viewing images and output devices for
Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Cultural Heritage Materials: Creation of Raster Image Master Files 4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 122 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.