Documents / Document

Package compiled for FAA managers

FAA via National Archives / The Black Vault · 122 pages · text from the file's own layer

This package was compiled by the FAA Alaskan Region Public Affairs Office in Anchorage and sent to FAA managers with a memo from Paul Steucke dated March 5, 1987. It gathers material on the November 17, 1986 sighting by the crew of Japan Air Lines flight 1628: a news release, pilot and controller transcripts, crew interviews and radar analysis. The FAA concluded that it could not confirm the event. It attributed the second radar target to a split, uncorrelated return from the JAL Boeing 747 and planned no further investigation.

  • p. 4 …They determined that a second radar target near the JAL flight at the time of the…
  • p. 5 AAL-5, FAA February 4, 1987 SELEX:TED PORI'IONS OF TRANSCRIPI'IOO ~ THE INCIDENI' INVOLVING…
  • p. 7 …Approach center (Fairbanks FAA tower) on the sixty one line. Approach. Look at your radar. We…
  • p. 8 …Sir, the military radar advises they do have a primary target in trail of you at…
  • p. 10 …see the traffic any long-er. Affinnative. Okay sir, we're searchi.rXJ this time, we…
  • p. 15 …Th ese uncorrelated primary returns are not uncommon, due critical timing associated with the delay adjustments…
  • p. 17 …Terauchi No, third time. R. Gordon This is the third time that ah that you've…
  • p. 18 …Terauchi Big Ship - yes and the second time ah, the, in my home I saw a…
  • p. 19 …Terauchi I think it was the first time. F. Fujii Who was the first person who…
  • p. 20 …Fujii From the forward you could see the flame and the exhaust and flame were surrounding…
  • p. 21 …This one and this one, the same logic, this point and this point are the same…
  • p. 23 …Fujii When did you pick it up, the radar? K. Terauchi Time? Time? F. Fujii Time…
  • p. 24 …Autopilot stayed on all the time. K. Terauchi Yeah • R. Gordon Okay K. Terauchi Working good…
  • p. 27 …Terauchi See this is the jumbo jet. 1.5, two times this light. R. Gordon Okay…
  • p. 28 …Gordon Yeah, let's see what would you estimate the size of the small ships to…
  • p. 33 …Gordon Yes, yes, you could probably explain that with the thing you have drawn here. Now…
  • p. 35 …See if they were stacked together at the beginning, one must have returned to the mothership…
  • p. 38 Meeting the Future by Kenju Terauchi M~ ,...,. ~ L. '1\ ti;f,) !ST .$, /Y11"'1ol"O Page…
  • p. 39 MEETING THE FUTURE .. Page 5 .. We took a flight course Southeast of Greenland direct to Chule…
  • p. 40 …the same time. The strange phenomenon happened immediately.after we began left rotation, following the order…
  • p. 41 …the ground radar did not show any aircraft but us. They also asked us several times…
  • p. 42 …I changed auto- focus to manual-focus and pressed the shutter but this time the shutter…
  • p. 47 …lone time before we received When we checked our rear there was still the ship!iI…
  • p. 48 …About the same time a United Airline passenger aircraft which left Anchorage to Fairbanks flew into…
  • p. 49 …About the same time a United Airline passenger aircraft which left Anchorage to Fairbanks flew into…
  • p. 50 ~Page 16~ The strange encounter ended at 75 miles North of Talkeetna, 150 miles (Approximately 276…
  • p. 51 …The following is a record of the interview: P. Beckner ? P. Beckner Conducted at this time…
  • p. 53 …clear • And you could distinguish this lights as being different from the star . . ?.. NNNooo . . . • from the…
  • p. 54 …Tamefuji ••• so maybe he couldn't see at that time, but the Captain and me (unintelligible…
  • p. 57 …Mimoto The physical requires him to wear glasses. P. Beckner Okay , how ' bout - how 'bout the…
  • p. 58 …Now - the time of the incident, when - when you guys first saw the objects, ah what…
  • p. 60 …long did you see this total, the length of time that you saw it? T. Tamefuji…
  • p. 66 …Beckner By the engineer table? T. Tamefuji Yes, I - when I saw, but ah, cockpit was…
  • p. 67 …the trip? He felt that, er, er, was it just during this period of time when…
  • p. 68 …Beckner First saw the object? T. Tamefuj1 Hummm , I thi nk ah , at the same time…
  • p. 69 …So pretty much at the same time you both saw it? T ~ Tamefuji Right P. Beckner…
  • p. 70 …Beckner ••• or were they pretty much the same intensity for the time that you saw them…
  • p. 72 …And tha - so that was the last time you saw it, was prior to the turn…
  • p. 74 …after I sighted it the first time. The reason is because the Captain wanted to take…
  • p. 75 …At the time of sighting, how were the lighting conditions outside? 2
  • p. 78 …When I was interviewed here at the first time by FAA personnel, I was not sure…
  • p. 80 PERSONNEL STATEMENT FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Anchorage Air Route Traffic Control Center January 6, 1987 The following…
  • p. 81 …ROCC did have primary ta r get in the same position JL1628 reported. Several times I…
  • p. 84 …During the time period p~ior to this incident all operations were normal. I had assigned…
  • p. 88 …They stated that all they oould see were the lights and at no time could they…
  • p. 100 …At no time did either crewmember see anything outside the aircraft. The area is not within…
  • p. 101 …directly over the town of Arctic Village, Alaska, at the time of the first sighting and…
  • p. 103 …Department of TransportctiOn Federal Aviation Administration (The event occurred Ofhce of Public Affus Alaskan Region 701…
  • p. 104 …18, 1986 UTC (The event occurred on November 17, 1986 Alaska Standard Time) PLE ASE MARK…
  • p. 114 …as derivatives and duplicates) • Document the image at the time of scanning, not what it may…
  • p. 115 …adjustments to the tone distribution and/or color balance. However, at this time, monitors for viewing…
  • p. 116 …benefits, at this time we feel that RGB files produced to the color and tone reproduction…
Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group -August 2010
ln general, master files have the following attributes:
•
•
•
Maintain the essential features and info1111ation of the original
Represent the best copy produced by a digitizing organization, with best defined as meeting the objectives
of a particular project or program
Represent digital content that the organization intends to maintain and manage for the long term
• Are created primarily for the production of a range of copies used for specific purposes (such as derivatives
and duplicates)
• Document the image at the time of scanning, not what it may once have looked like if restored to its
original condition
Institutions may create one or more digital master copies depending on the nah1re of the originals and the intended
purpose of digitization. Digitization should be done in a "use-neutral" manner, and should not geared for any
specific output. If digitization is done to recommended image parameters and all other requirements as described in
these Guidelin es, we believe the master image files produced should be usable for a wide variety of applications and
outputs. If digitization is done to meet the alternative minimum image parameters and all other requirements, the
master image files should be usable for many access applications, particularly for web usage and reproduction
requests.
Generally, given the high costs and effort for digitization projects, we do not recommend digitizing to anything less
than the alternative minimum image parameters. This assumes availability of suitable high-quality digitization
equipment that meets the assessment criteria described (see the section on Quantifying Scanner/Digital Camera
Perfonnance) and produces image files that meet the minimum quality described in the Guidelines. If digitization
equipment fails any of tht: ass t:ssmta1t l:rileria or is um1bk lo μruJul:t: i1m1gt: fiks uf miuimum quality, lht:n it may bt:
desirable to invest in better equipment or to contract with a vendor for digitization services.
SCOPE
The focus of the Guidelines is on historical , cultural and archival materials . The scope is limited to digitization
practices for still image materials only (e.g. , textual content, maps, photographic prints and negatives) .
The Guidelines are intended to be infom1ative, not prescriptive. We acknowledge that this document does not
address the entire range of imaging quality parameters (such as noise, distortion, etc.), but these topics will be
incorporated as the Still Image Working Group identifies recommendations in these areas. The Working Group has
produced a "Gap Analysis" document that identifies and prioritizes digitization activities that are not currently
defined within existing agency guidelines, or are not adequately addressed by existing guidelines. The Gap Analysis
contains topics that the Working Group intends to investigate and provide as updates and recommendations in future
versions of these Guidelines.
The current Gap Analysis can be found on the F ADGI website at :
http ://www.digitizationguidelines.gov/stillimages/documents/Gap.html.
We hope to provide a technical foundation for digitization activities , but further research will be necessary to make
infonned decisions regarding all aspects of administrative, operational, and technical issues surrounding the creation
of digital images. These guidelines provide a range of options for various technical aspects of digitization primarily
relating to image capture, but do not recommend a single approach .
The following topics are addressed in thi s document:
Digital image capture for still images - creation of master files , image parameters, digitization
environment, color management, etc.
• Color encoding accuracy - color space. color temperature for imaging and viewing, quality of linear vs.
area arrays, and quality of different interpolation algorithms
Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Cultural Heritage Materials : Creation of Raster Image Master Files 2
---- I
)

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 122 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.