Documents / FOIA release

roswell

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 993 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published in 1995 by Headquarters United States Air Force. It was written in response to Representative Steven H. Schiff's request and a General Accounting Office audit, and it contains Col. Richard L. Weaver's report and 1st Lt. James McAndrew's synopsis, along with attachments, appendices and photographs. The report says researchers found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concludes that the 1947 debris came from a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 439 …it desired) Payload in~trumentation 1 ea. banner, 3 1 x 61 Data sheets. Weight sheets…
  • p. 550 …When mounted above the 'cloth identification banner, this chute also acts to minimize rrwe.y and…
  • p. 663 …A banner may be seen in Figure 30.. White banners seem to be the most generally…
  • p. 664 Figure 30 General Mills 20 foot balloon in flight, showine; banner and other flight train components.
  • p. 726 …description --------- Line leneth .---------------------------- Banner description --------------------------Ballast assembly .. description ______,.. Ballast • • .. • • '" • Total Equipment l~eight. • • • • ' Gross Load • • ' • • • • {56)
  • p. 860 …cutter cannon • • • • • • • • • 26 15 , Detail drawing of banner • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 28 16 • Typical service flight train (complete) • • • • • • • •• 30…
  • p. 881 …These are: (l) a banner, (2) a drag parachute, and (3) safety-weights. The banner is…
  • p. 882 …6' 12' NYU BALLOON PROJECT 3' 6' BANNER ~~~ Date~ 5-19-48 ED 48-5 6…
  • p. 937 2 ea. Parachutes ML-132 1 ea. Banner. 3' x 6' 4 ea. Data sheets 4…
  • p. 938 …description.______________ Drag chute ---------------------------- Banner description --------------- ---------- Ballast assembly - description -----------~-- Ballast • • • • • • Total Equipment i'ieight • • ' • • • • • • Gross Load • • • • • • • • • • • -86-
'lhis flight pattern represents the best approximation to constant
level flight that we have obtained with meteorological clusters.
F1ights 8 and ll each employed more than one polyethylene balloon
in an attempt to reach higher altitude than possible with the single
balloons then available. Figure 39 • 40, 41, 44 and 45 show the type
and arrangement of balloons and their flight behavior. In both fli;hts.
the maximum altitude was not high enough to cause activation of the
autaaatio ballast valve. Consequently, there was no compensation for
diffusion other than the steady leakage of ballast through the imperfect
seating of the valve. In flight 8, after one hour, this leak was not
sufficient to maintain a constant altitude, so the flight terminated.
Ho-wever, in flight 11. constant altitude was maintained at 16.000 ft.
~ 1500 feet for 7 hours until all of the ballast was expended.
Flight 10, in contrast to flights 8 and 11, did reach an altitude
at which the automatic ballast control was actuated, resulting in a
flight of perhaps more than 26 hours. Although the maximum altitude
reached by this heavy spherical cell was 15.000 feet, the ballast control
was effective at a level of 9000 feet. The expected difference between
activation level and operation level was probably exceeded because of the
temperature effect of the air entrapped in the pressure capsule.
Figure 42 shows the train, and figure 43 shows the time-altitude
curve for the 512 minutes of radiosonde data.
The oscillations around 9000 feet during the last two hours of
data rrtAY be attributed to the changing buoyancy of the balloon as cloud
masses intermittently shielded it from the sun's rays. An unconfirmed
report was received to the effect that this balloon was still floating
26 hours later over Pueblo, Colorado.
- 28 -

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 993 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.