Documents / FOIA release

roswell

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 993 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published in 1995 by Headquarters United States Air Force. It was written in response to Representative Steven H. Schiff's request and a General Accounting Office audit, and it contains Col. Richard L. Weaver's report and 1st Lt. James McAndrew's synopsis, along with attachments, appendices and photographs. The report says researchers found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concludes that the 1947 debris came from a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 19 …MOGUL; their job was to deliver nuclear weapons, not to detect them. The unusual combination of…
  • p. 36 …happened near Roswell may have involved nuclear weapons. This was a logical area of concern since…
  • p. 41 …to determine the state of Soviet nuclear weapons research. This was the early Cold War period…
  • p. 183 …that time where we either dropped a weapon or did something stupid, which we had to…
  • p. 201 …long range balloons; although not effective as weapons, they did initiate the long-range balloon research…
  • p. 213 …Charles Ziegler was working on the history of nuclear weapons detection capability. He had some letters…
  • p. 249 …Out PM with several NYU men by weapons carrier, but we never located it. Rocket postponed…
  • p. 251 …so I took a weapons carrier and drove up there. We were aggressively trying to recover…
  • p. 253 …We drove up in a weapons carrier to the Roswell Army Air Field, and tried to…
  • p. 264 …We civilians were driving weapons carriers to carry helium around, and to go into town to…
  • p. 273 …a book on the history of nuclear weapons detection. It figured, of course, that Project MOGUL…
  • p. 274 …I had considerable background in nuclear weapons detection, using devices that I had developed in the…
  • p. 326 …in the :world capable of delivering nuclear weapons. It now appears that the debris from MOGUL…
  • p. 401 …a.~tack:; -;;it"t st.~c!"et weapons. ' The moat prom1a1ne. .eJ"PC'• oi: li6tening etatlon…
  • p. 804 …Dec 13 Fri.Woody and I left Alamogordo Air Base in weapon carrier and scouted out…
  • p. 805 …went in borrowed weapon carrier. '.:oody and Jeff 7owler took other weapon carrier ::1~d collected…
  • p. 808 …Phil and Sal went out to Dona and Launching Sites with weapon carrier. Hoffman, DeTurk and…
  • p. 812 …May 19 Mon Reynolds and I left about 0745 in weapon carrier for Silver City. Arrived…
  • p. 813 …Edmondson and I left about 0845 in weapon carrier for Roswell. Arrived at Hagerman about 12…
  • p. 815 …Out pm with several NYU by weapon carrier but we never located it. Rocket postponed until…
.u; a:s:e!T
II EXlSTE'iCE OF A SOU:m CHAN:fEl iN TRF AT"'C~PHERE
In ~eptember, 1944, 1 t occurred to me that there
is a s1~1lar sound channel 1n the atmosphere with the axis
at a height of about 45,000 teet, and that, with eource and
receiver plsced at th1e height, we might exceed the accepted
range.!! a a enormously UJ we had tn the ocean. ln other wot"da,
it might be -poat~ib~.e to detect sound halt way aro•.1nd the world.
~: ..
The fundamental data on this subject as revealed_dur1ng
a hur~ied search of the literature (mostly nrior to 19~0), ahow
that, for a t:voical large exoloe1on, there is at:dibility from
0 to 25 miles an1 froM 90 to 125 miles, with a zone of silence
from 25 to ~0 ~1lee. The accepted explanation of the total
collection of these dat:t is tbat tt1e 5T)eed of sound deore:ases
fro"'- about l 090 tt/see at the ~urtace to about 970 ft/sec at
about 45,000 feet, a:::d tt:cn inc:reases to abo:1t 1165 ft/sec
at a~ut 130,000 feet. (Reference 2)
Thu~ there 1~ a ~oun1 ~hannel in the atmosphere
with its axis at a ~ei;bt of aco~t 45,000 feot, nnd if both
sound source and 7-'aceiver are located at th!:: height, ".te
!!WY a.x:;>ect extr:aoro1nary !'lilnges and all the othor nseful
~heno~ena which have been found in the sound channel ln
the ocean. This means that the signals will have highly
eharaeter1st1c 1dent1fy1ng features anj that they will permit
aeou~te tr1an~ulat1on.
III ?ROBABLE 7lAXIJ:UM F\A~lGE
'l'he maxlmul'll N.nge ror sonic signalling 1n the
ataoapher1o aoum ehannel.w111 :1epend pr1Dt&r1ly on the
absorption coeff1c1ent, which 1a .the rate at wblcb the
acoustical energy 1a converted 1nto heat_by fr1ct1onal los~ea.
•ollow1ag Rayleigh (Rete~ence 3, P• 316), it MAy be calculated
that· the distance at Wb1ob·eound of.trequency 50 cycles ~er
aecoDd would be reduced 1n 1ntena1ty by the !aotor 7.5 by
the ettect or t'r1otion alone 1a about 24,000.m1lea at sea level,
aDd about '500 allea at 45,000 feet~ Aa these d1atancea
are ·1nverflely proportional to tbe square or the frequency,
they would be one hundred t1mes greater tor sounds of fJ"equeney
5 oyele., oer •econd, wbioh ha•e often 'been o'bee~ved when
large ex~loa1ona we~e •tud1ed.
•••••

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 993 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.