Documents / FOIA release

rosswe1

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 31 pages · text from the file's own layer

This July 1994 Department of the Air Force package, from SAF/AAZ to the Secretary of the Air Force, covers a report written to support a General Accounting Office audit requested by Congressman Steven Schiff. The Air Force searched its offices, archives and records centers and interviewed witnesses, including Sheridan Cavitt. It found no evidence of an extraterrestrial event, alien bodies or a cover-up. It concludes that the debris recovered near Roswell in 1947 most likely came from a Project MOGUL balloon.

  • p. 1 …Report of Air Force Research Regarding the "Roswell Incident" JUL 2 7 19~·M Attached is…
  • p. 2 REPORT OF AIR FORCE RESEARCH REGARDING THE "ROSWELL INCIDENT" . JULY 1994
  • p. 3 REPORT OF AIR FORCE RESEARCH REGARDING THE 11ROSWELL INCIDENT" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The "Roswell Incident" refers to…
  • p. 4 INTRODUCTION Air Force involvement in the alleged UFO-related incident popularly known as the "Roswell Incident…
  • p. 5 …THE "ROSWELL INCIDENT"-WHATWAS ORIGINALLY REPORTED IN 1947 The modem preoccupation with what ultimately came to…
  • p. 6 …Interestingly, the "Roswell Incident" was not considered one of these 1947 events until the 1978-1980…
  • p. 7 …The overall thrust of these articles, books, and shows is that the "Roswell Incident" was actually…
  • p. 8 …Once back at Roswell Army Air Field, it is generally alleged that special measures were taken…
  • p. 9 …What is uniquely lacking in the entire exploration and exploitation of the "Roswell Incident" is official…
  • p. 10 …of "over two dozen" personnel stationed at Roswell in July, 1947, to the Veterans Adminis- tration…
  • p. 11 …program involving, or relating to, the events at Roswell or the alleged technology that supposedly 17
  • p. 12 …they found that might be related to Roswell. SAF/ AAZD conducted reviews at a number of…
  • p. 13 …WHAT THE ROSWELL INCIDENT WAS NOT Before discussing specific positive results that these efforts revealed, it…
  • p. 14 …A Nuclear Accident One of the areas considered was that whatever happened near Roswell may have…
  • p. 15 …There is no similar mention of his personal interest or involvement in Roswell events except in…
  • p. 16 …WHAT THE "ROSWELL INCIDENT" WAS As previously discussed, what was originally reported to have been recovered…
  • p. 17 …Porter (B-29 flight Engineer stationed at Roswell in 1947). Affidavit dated June 7, 1991. " ... On…
  • p. 18 …Newton was a weather officer assigned to Fort Worth, who was on duty when the Roswell…
  • p. 21 …came to rest some miles northwest of Roswell, NM, became shredded in the surface winds, and…
  • p. 22 …had also discovered the possibility that the "Roswell Incident" may have been generated by the recovery…
  • p. 23 …appeared to be directly responsible for the "Roswell Incident," a ;~ 1AAZD researcher_ prepared a more detail…
  • p. 24 …CONCLUSION The Air Force research did not locate or develop any information that the "Roswell Incident…
  • p. 25 …alien bodies" make their living _from the "Roswell Incident." While having a commercial interest in something…
  • p. 27 …Popularly known as the Roswell Incident, this event has become the most celebrated UFO encounter of…
  • p. 29 …Additionally, many claims of a flying saucer crash at Roswell rest on the description of debris…
  • p. 30 …Additionally, many claims of a flying saucer crash at Roswell rest on the description of debris…
  • p. 31 …This report· explains the events that transpired in and near Roswell, New Mexico, in the summer…
23-24). These interviews confirmed that Project MOGUL was a compartmented,
sensitive effort. The NYU group was responsible for developing constant level
balloons and telemetering equipment that would remain at specified altitudes
(within the acoustic duct) while a group from Columbia was_ to develop acoustic
sensors. Doctor Spilhaus,- Professor Moore, and certain others of the group were
aware of the actual purpose of the project, but they did not know of the project
nickname at the time. They handled casual inquiries and/or scientific inqui-
ries/papers in terms of "unclassified meteorological or balloon research." Newly
hired employees were not made aware that there was anything special or
classified about their work; they were told only that their work dealt with
meteorological equipment.
An advance ground team, led by Albert P. Crary, preceded the NYU group to
Alamogordo Army Air Field, New Mexico, setting up ground sensors and
obtaining facilities for the NYU group. Upon their arrival, Professor Moore and
his team experimented with various configurations of neoprene balloons;
development of balloon "trains" (see illustration, Atch 25); automatic ballast
systems; and use of Naval sonobuoys (as the Watson Lab acoustical sensors had
not yet arrived). They also launched what they called "service flights." These
"service flights" were not logged nor fully accounted for in the published
Technical Reports generated as a result of the contract between NYU and Watson
Labs. According to Professor Moore, the "service flights" were composed of
balloons, radar reflectors, and payloads specifically designed to test acoustic
sensors (both early sonobuoys and the later Watson Labs devices). The "payload
equipment" was expendable, and some carried no "Reward" or "Return to ... "
tags because there was to be no association between these flights and the logged
constant altitude flights which were fully acknowledged. The NYU balloon flights
were listed sequentially in their reports (i.e., A, B, or 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 ... ), yet gaps
existed for Flights 2-4 and Flight 9. The interview with Professor Moore indicated
that these gaps were the unlogged "service flights."
Professor Moore, the on-scene Project Engineer, gave detailed information
concerning his team's efforts. He recalled that radar targets were used for tracking
balloons because they did not have all the necessary equipment when they first
arrived in New Mexico. Some of the early developmental radar targets were
manufactured by a toy or novelty company. These targets were made up of
aluminum "foil" or foil-backed paper, balsa wood beams that were coated in an
"Elmer' s-type" glue to enhance their durability, acetate and/ or cloth reinforcing
tape, single strand and braided nylon twine, brass eyelets and swivels to form a
multi-faced reflector somewhat similar in construction to a box kite (see photo-
graphs, Atch 26). Some of these targets were also assembled with purplish-pink
tape with symbols on it (see drawing by Moore with Atch 21).
According to the log summary (Atch 27) of the NYU group, Flight A through
Flight 7 (November 20, 1946-July 2, 1947) were made with neoprene meteorologi-
cal balloons (as opposed to the later flights made with polyethylene balloons).
Professor Moore stated that the neoprene balloons were susceptible to degrada-
26

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 31 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.