Documents / FOIA release

rosswe1

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 31 pages · text from the file's own layer

This July 1994 Department of the Air Force package, from SAF/AAZ to the Secretary of the Air Force, covers a report written to support a General Accounting Office audit requested by Congressman Steven Schiff. The Air Force searched its offices, archives and records centers and interviewed witnesses, including Sheridan Cavitt. It found no evidence of an extraterrestrial event, alien bodies or a cover-up. It concludes that the debris recovered near Roswell in 1947 most likely came from a Project MOGUL balloon.

  • p. 1 …Report of Air Force Research Regarding the "Roswell Incident" JUL 2 7 19~·M Attached is…
  • p. 2 REPORT OF AIR FORCE RESEARCH REGARDING THE "ROSWELL INCIDENT" . JULY 1994
  • p. 3 REPORT OF AIR FORCE RESEARCH REGARDING THE 11ROSWELL INCIDENT" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The "Roswell Incident" refers to…
  • p. 4 INTRODUCTION Air Force involvement in the alleged UFO-related incident popularly known as the "Roswell Incident…
  • p. 5 …THE "ROSWELL INCIDENT"-WHATWAS ORIGINALLY REPORTED IN 1947 The modem preoccupation with what ultimately came to…
  • p. 6 …Interestingly, the "Roswell Incident" was not considered one of these 1947 events until the 1978-1980…
  • p. 7 …The overall thrust of these articles, books, and shows is that the "Roswell Incident" was actually…
  • p. 8 …Once back at Roswell Army Air Field, it is generally alleged that special measures were taken…
  • p. 9 …What is uniquely lacking in the entire exploration and exploitation of the "Roswell Incident" is official…
  • p. 10 …of "over two dozen" personnel stationed at Roswell in July, 1947, to the Veterans Adminis- tration…
  • p. 11 …program involving, or relating to, the events at Roswell or the alleged technology that supposedly 17
  • p. 12 …they found that might be related to Roswell. SAF/ AAZD conducted reviews at a number of…
  • p. 13 …WHAT THE ROSWELL INCIDENT WAS NOT Before discussing specific positive results that these efforts revealed, it…
  • p. 14 …A Nuclear Accident One of the areas considered was that whatever happened near Roswell may have…
  • p. 15 …There is no similar mention of his personal interest or involvement in Roswell events except in…
  • p. 16 …WHAT THE "ROSWELL INCIDENT" WAS As previously discussed, what was originally reported to have been recovered…
  • p. 17 …Porter (B-29 flight Engineer stationed at Roswell in 1947). Affidavit dated June 7, 1991. " ... On…
  • p. 18 …Newton was a weather officer assigned to Fort Worth, who was on duty when the Roswell…
  • p. 21 …came to rest some miles northwest of Roswell, NM, became shredded in the surface winds, and…
  • p. 22 …had also discovered the possibility that the "Roswell Incident" may have been generated by the recovery…
  • p. 23 …appeared to be directly responsible for the "Roswell Incident," a ;~ 1AAZD researcher_ prepared a more detail…
  • p. 24 …CONCLUSION The Air Force research did not locate or develop any information that the "Roswell Incident…
  • p. 25 …alien bodies" make their living _from the "Roswell Incident." While having a commercial interest in something…
  • p. 27 …Popularly known as the Roswell Incident, this event has become the most celebrated UFO encounter of…
  • p. 29 …Additionally, many claims of a flying saucer crash at Roswell rest on the description of debris…
  • p. 30 …Additionally, many claims of a flying saucer crash at Roswell rest on the description of debris…
  • p. 31 …This report· explains the events that transpired in and near Roswell, New Mexico, in the summer…
resulted therefrom. Besides the obvious irregularity and illegality of keeping such
information from the most senior Air Force officials, it would also be illogical,
since these officials are responsible for obtaining funding for operations, research,
development, and security. Without- funding, such a program, operation, or
organization could not exist. Even to keep such a fact "covered..;up" in some sort
of passive "caretaker status" would involve money. More importantly, it would
involve people and create paperwork.
The aforementioned March 1, 1994, SAF I AA tasking generated negative responses
(Atchs 6-12) from all recipients; i.e., all offices reported that they had no informa-
tion that would explain the incident. Consequently, these negative responses led
to an increase in the already ongoing historical research at records centers and
archives.
The extensive archival and records center search was systematically carried out
by the SAF/ AAZD Declassification Review Team. This team is composed entirely
of Air Force Reserve personnel who have extensive training and experience in
large scale review of records. (Previous efforts include the Southeast Asia
Declassification Review, declassification of POW /MIA records, and the review of
the Gulf War Air Power Survey records.) The team members all had the requisite
security clearances for classified information and had the authority of the
Secretary of the Air Force to declassify any classified record they found that might
be related to Roswell. SAF/ AAZD conducted reviews at a number of locations,
including the National Archives in Washington, DC; the National Personnel
Records Center, St. Louis, MO; the National Archives, Suitland MD; the National
Records Center, Suitland, MD; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC;
Federal Records Center, Ft Worth, TX; the INSCOM Archives, Fort Meade, MD;
National Air and Space Museum, Washington, DC; Air Force Historical Research
Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL; Center for Air Force History, Bolling AFB, DC;
Phillips Laboratory, Hanscom AFB, MA and Kirtland AFB, NM; Rome Laboratory,
Griffiss AFB, NY; and the Library of Congress, Washington, DC.
A listing of the specific record areas searched is appended as Atch 13. The areas
included all those subject areas logically believed to possibly contain any
reference to activities at Roswell Army Air Field during the period of time in
question. It is anticipated that detractors from this effort will complain that "they
did not search record group x, boxy, or reel z, etc.; that's where the real records
are!" Such complaints are unavoidable and there is no possible way that the
millions of records under Air Force control could be searched page by page. The
team endeavored to make logical searches in those places where records would
likely be found. They were assisted in this task by archivists, historians, and
records management specialists, including experienced persons who have
continually worked in Army and Air Force records systems since 1943. The team
also searched some record areas that were recommended by serious private
researchers such as Robert Todd, who had independently obtained almost
encyclopedic knowledge of the complexities of Air Force records systems,
particularly those related to this subject area.
18

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 31 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.