Documents / Hearing transcript

Official hearing transcript PDF (mirror)

Congress.gov · 54 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the official transcript of a July 26, 2023 hearing held by the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability's Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs, titled "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency." Witnesses Ryan Graves, David Grusch and retired Commander David Fravor testified under oath. Members pressed for transparency, and Graves described a near midair encounter with a cube inside a clear sphere.

  • p. 5 …Without objection, the Chair may declare a recess at any time. Additionally, without objection, the following…
  • p. 7 …I would say that is the biggest understatement of the decade. He also goes on to…
  • p. 8 …And I yield back the remainder of my time, I think—is it to Rep- resentative…
  • p. 9 …Even more alarming is the fact that these eyewitnesses are, many times, service members and have…
  • p. 10 …Now, some of the earliest reporting on this issue was a groundbreaking 2017 New York Times…
  • p. 12 …I want to yield the two and a half minutes, the remainder of my time, to…
  • p. 13 …I believe more information is known about the 171 instances. It is time for Congress to…
  • p. 15 11 was no official acknowledgement of the incident and no further mechanism to report the sightings…
  • p. 16 …At the time, due to my extensive executive level intelligence sup- port duties I was cleared…
  • p. 18 …the articles in the 2017 New York Times and it removed the stigma on the topic…
  • p. 19 …for the United States and best for the citizens. I thank you for your time. Thank…
  • p. 21 …Now, that was our personal firsthand experience at the time. Since then, as I have engaged…
  • p. 25 …Like many others in 2017, I saw the New York Times article come out as well…
  • p. 28 …They had official documentation and records from the event that the witness held over the years…
  • p. 29 25 provide precise kinematics on the object as well as the fleet of ob- jects that…
  • p. 31 …I will yield the balance of my time back. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. GROTHMAN. Ms…
  • p. 37 …I just—my time is limited. Mr. Graves, one of your main concerns that the FAA…
  • p. 39 …I know for a fact the video or the pic- tures that came out in the…
  • p. 46 …our speed in no time at all. Mr. LANGWORTHY. Now, if the fastest plane on Earth…
  • p. 48 …Chairman, with that, I will yield the remainder of my time to my fellow colleague from…
  • p. 50 …Chairman, I yield the remain- der of my time. Mr. GROTHMAN. OK. We will go to…
  • p. 51 …credibility to the New York Times article. And so after about six times I said OK…
  • p. 53 49 I also want to note for our witnesses and for the public that I am…
  • p. 54 …I need to compliment the folks in my office that did a lot of the work…
26
have direct knowledge yourself about ATs—advanced tech-
nologies—that the U.S. Government has?
Mr. GRUSCH. Based on conventional advanced tech I was briefed
to the preponderance of the Defense Department’s both space and
aerospace compartmented programs. Yes.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Do you have knowledge, or do you have reason
to believe, that there are programs in the advanced tech space that
are unsanctioned?
Mr. GRUSCH. Yes, I do.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. OK. And when you say that they are above con-
gressional oversight what do you mean?
Mr. GRUSCH. A complicated question. So, there is, you know,
some—I would call it abuse here. So, congressional oversight of
conventional Special Access Programs—and I will use Title 10,
DoD as an example, right.
So, 10 U.S. Code Section 119 discusses congressional oversight of
SAPs, discusses the DEP/SecDef’s ability to waive congressional re-
porting. However, the Gang of 8 is at least supposed to be notified
if a—you know, a waived or a waive bigoted unacknowledged SAP
is created and that is public law.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Well, so then how does—I mean, I do not want
to cut you off, but how does a program like that get funded?
Mr. GRUSCH. I will give you generalities. I can get very specific
in a closed session. But misappropriation of funds and self-fund.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Does that mean that there is money in the
budget that is set to go to a program, but it does not, and it goes
to something else?
Mr. GRUSCH. Yes. I have specific knowledge of that. Yes.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Do you think U.S. corporations are overcharging
for certain tech they are selling to the U.S. Government and that
additional money is going to programs?
Mr. GRUSCH. Correct, through something called IR&D.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. OK. Satellite imagery—let us talk about sat-
ellite imagery. We have satellites all over the place, some that we
are aware of and many that we are not aware of, right. We are tak-
ing pictures of everything at every point and second.
Mr. Grusch, are you aware—do you have direct knowledge, or
have you talked to people with direct knowledge, that there are
satellite imagery of these events?
Mr. GRUSCH. That was one of my primary tasks at NGA since
we process, exploit, and disseminate that kind of information. I
have seen multiple cases, some of which to my understanding—
and, of course, I left NGA in April so that is my information cutoff
date.
But I personally review both what we call overhead collection
and from other strategic and tactical platforms that were—I could
not even explain prosaically, and I have a degree in physics, by the
way, as well. And I had—I am aware that you guys have not seen
these reports, unfortunately and I do not know why.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Do you have direct knowledge, or have you spo-
ken to people with direct knowledge, that this imagery applies to
crash sites—crash imagery?
Mr. GRUSCH. I cannot discuss that in an open session.

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 54 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.