Documents / Official release

Office of the Secretary of Defense: 25_Sky_View_Final_Draft

Department of Defense. Office of the Secretary of Defense. · 2023 · 16 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a 2023 draft research paper by Richard M. Medina and Simon Brewer of the University of Utah and Sean M. Kirkpatrick of the Department of Defense, prepared for journal submission and released in full by AARO in 2025. It analyzes 98,724 NUFORC public sighting reports from 2001 to 2020 by county with a Bayesian model. It finds that more light pollution and tree canopy mean fewer sightings, while more air traffic and military area mean more. Cloud cover showed no relationship.

  • p. 4 …NUFORC was formed in 1974 and “the Center’s primary function over the past four decades…
  • p. 5 …Figure 1 Timeline of NUFORC Reported Sightings from 2001-2020 Figure 2 provides a visualization of…
  • p. 6 025 Figure 2 NUFORC Reported Sighting Spatial Distribution for the Conterminous U.S. from 2001-2020…
  • p. 7 …It should also be mentioned here that NUFORC accepts online, phone, and written reports to assist…
  • p. 8 …Models The NUFORC dataset is first explored alone to identify general spatial patterns of reported sightings…
  • p. 11 …question 1, the publicly available data from NUFORC online are useable data; however, they require processing…
  • p. 12 …A final issue we consider is that these reported cases require knowledge of NUFORC and access…
  • p. 15 …https://nuforc.org/about-us/. National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) (2023c) File a Report. https://nuforc…
025
were given, but were still locatable, when spelling errors in the city field were corrected. For
those, coordinates were added using online Microsoft services to construct a more complete
dataset. The final resulting mappable dataset includes 121,949 points (locatable in the United
States), which is 99.16% of the total extraction. For simplicity and interpretation, we focus on
the conterminous U.S. from 2001 to 2020, which reduces the number of reported sightings to
98,724. For the analysis we use the total number of sightings per county across this time period
to allow us to focus on the spatial patterns. Our temporal range is selected such that entries are
assumed to be relatively recent events and not generated from memories decades ago. Internet
access to report a sighting would be more feasible beginning about 2000, and is likely
responsible for the increase in sighting reports over time. A timeline of reported sightings for the
study period is provided in Figure 1, with a marked peak in sightings between 2012 and 2014,
followed by a sharp drop between 2015 and 2018.
Figure 1 Timeline of NUFORC Reported Sightings from 2001-2020
Figure 2 provides a visualization of the reported sighting spatial distribution for the
conterminous U.S. Our preliminary analyses included Alaska and Hawaii; however, the tree
canopy dataset did not cover the entirety of Alaska, rather it only included a coastal region.
Because of this, we decided to limit the study to the conterminous U.S. The sighting point
dataset was aggregated up to the county level for analysis. We selected county, rather than a city
resolution for spatial continuity across the conterminous U.S., which helps with interpreting the
results. Also, since these events are relatively rare, counties provide large enough areas for a
meaningful aggregation of points. For our exploratory analysis, the NUFORC data were
standardized by population, such that they are reported as sightings per 10,000 people.Page determined to be Unclassified
Reviewed by Chief of Staff, AARO
IAW FY24 NDAA, Section 1841 (a)(1)(C)
Date: 02/06/2025

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the nara collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 16 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.