Colonel De Brouver:
AUTHORIZED PUBLICATION OF DOCUMENTS
FROM THE BELGIAN MINISTRY OF DEFENCE LE COLONEL
"OUR DEFENSE
SYSTEM IS
POWERLESS AGAINST
THESE MACHINES"
FrOffl French ffle9HN PARIS-MATCH, No. 2145, July 5, 1'90. DE BROUWER :
'NOTRE SYsnME
DE DEFENSEA UFO ON THE F16's RADAR
l~\'rlwi1"' 11tH1rl fi,r CSETI •
/~ IUIS-MIi TC/; ·1,p JS:t11#it:s'4bf1i:s1.: ,Ir. llm.ur-s
. ASHEVILLE, NC 288r3 ·
EST IMPUISSANT
FACE ACES
ENGINS
W r. nre authorized l,y the Dclgi;rn Mi11i:i1try or l)c-
rcucc to pul,list. thi:1 docu111c11ta1io11. It's Mt/,,:
J ,,f f/,r Jkir.f-_ These two screens (s l1ow11 in the
acc11111p,myin~ photos) are the incontestnl,lc testimony
lo nn cncountcr between Science ;iml Fiction. For the
first time c.,.er, the Belgian Air Force has ngreed to di-
. vulgc the radar-imngcs or a UFO intercepted l,y the
rilots or its F-l(u. 11,c recordings were rcgistcrc-laclc l,ux" or the F-16 aircrafi
•; _thnt, in the night or March 30/J I last, was sent up in
; pursuit of An unidentilicd 0ying object. (TI,is isn't the
!. really big chase that WAS to happen two weeks later,
i . M:1ybc we nn: ,wt alone in ·t!•e Univc.rse. · . -'
, , IV/111 Jn)'S t!,is? It is tl,ti Mililm_')', the /mwe,-bi,,lly
/ si/,:,1t Military. 17,r.;• nrr lt'lli11.~ )"Ill that t!,r UFOs a1Y! m,
1• fll)'lh. 1i"I")', 011 )1111,: 22, 1990, for tht: first time t:t'f!r,
'. nrr Air Foret: furs rrmstmlt:tl In r,w1:11I (i11 /K1rl) n majflr
/1m'tim1 /nm, this file wlrid, is ,wt Sc Brouwer, .. It
'would ha\'C l,ccn quite out or the quc!'.tion for the
F-IGs to have been able lo ovcrt.ake the machine nl
:'th:1t low altitude, where the density of the air prevents
them from going faster than 1,300 kms.p.h. Ueyond
:ti.at speed, the temperature in the compressors or
,. ,their engines woulnrled /mm immediately bt:lma ~ n11ent. . u,/1ereas,
git,,:11 ti,,: s/>«d 011d tlie lou, allitud,: of ti,,: 111ac/1i11e, its
brt:aki11g of Ifie wu11d-barrier ought ta /,av,: led to the
slratt,:ri11g of 011 i11calculable numbt:r of pant!l of gltw..
11-lERMO~NO MACHINE IS CAPABLE OF
FLYING AT 1,800 KMS.P.H. SO CLOSE TO THE
GROUND; IN SUCH DENSE AIR AND - A
FOR110Rl - wrrnotrr EVEN MAKING ANY
DANG~•
Next I asked: -Was it a natural phenomenon, or the
re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere or a piece or
rocket debris?"
Answer: •No. A meteorite or a rocket fragment docs
not penetrate our atmosphere in a -zig-zag fashion.
And the analysis or the radar recordings shows
numerous changes or direction. Ft•rthcrmore, the
atmospheric conditions at the time ruled out any
. ph_cnomenon of an elcctromaanctic.nat~re-.
Proressor Jean-PierTc Petit or Fran~ "finis high•
ranking physicist. who is a Director or Research at the
French National Centre For Scientific Research
(CNRS) and who has just recently written the book