Documents / Document

MOD file DEFE 24/2032/1

The Black Vault · 492 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Ministry of Defence file, released through The National Archives and published by The Black Vault, holds the MOD's 2002 handling of Dr David Clarke's requests for UFO documents under the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information. It includes the MOD's 9 December 2002 reply, which covered reports from 1976, 1980, 1993 and 1996 and charged £260. It also contains internal emails and file requisitions, plus Foreign Office and United Nations papers from 1978 on Grenada's proposal for UFO research.

I ~ l •, I' 12'"'''., ...'k{ • mo.me i -thos been ry of ;,t the added _, very .tions~ burnt where ~d to been their :icked r:1ings jesty's le of The easing r, and ·ld the from e not hlings, {have is, but urbing pretty le told I am ~pared d that ts are )Se the ndings could people , is to 1ent at like to e will 1d the sibility about ss the i go a d by a t there 1e way United 'to see UFOs. ter and Is, and to the 1253 Unidentified [ 18 JANUARY 1979] Flying Objects 1254 public. Finally, I should like to thank as I say, that these unexplained sightings your Lordships for your kind attention, could be-and, indeed, would be-ex- and 1 beg to move for Papers. plained, if we had more knov.·Iedgc about them; for example, better photographs. How many ciear photographs of UFOs have yo:1r Lordships seea? Alii have seen are hazy, fudgy pho~ogi·aphs which could, or co11Id not, be genuine. 7.29 p.m. Lord TREFGARNE: My Lords, I am bound to say that I face making this spee<;h with some trepidation. I bad wondered whether we could j:!stify the holding of what is in eiTcct a full deb'-l.lc on tills matter; but having seen the audience we have tonight, and indeed having heard the speech of the no~ie Earl, Lord Clancarty, I can see that that so;·t of thought would not go down too well. I may v.:ell be shouted down before I finish anyway, but let us see if we can avoid that right }!t the start. The noble Earl asked us in his Motion to support a proposal particularly for an intra-governmental study-I suppose he means, as indeed he has described, between Governments. No doubt he would wish to see the co-operation of the United States. But I should not want to support that kind of proposal. I do not think the time has yet come when we can view this matter with sufficient certainty to justify the expenditure of public money on it. I certainly agree that the numerous \roluntary bodies, including those with f.\vhich the noble Earl is associat~d, ought to be encouraged, and indeed I should not /d be opposed to infon:1al links between j those bodies-or, at least the re~ponsiblc l ones-and others, such as the Ministry l of Defence. But I am ashamed to say, in the midst of all this faith, that I am not myself a believer in UFOs described, as I believe they are, as objects or vehicles from another planet or from another universe. I have some 2,500 hours as a pilot. I have flown across the atlantic a few times as a pilot. But, unlike with the aircraft reported by the noble Earl, I have never seen one. I presume-indeed, I believe-that a good many of the sightings can be explained by logical scientific theory and I am, so far at least, convinced that those that cannot so far be so explained could be, if our knowledge were more advanced or if we had more information about the sightings in question. It is these unexplained sightings upon which ufologists rely so heavily in asking us to accept their theories. But I believe, Ufologists often rely upon radar infor- m<l.tion for evidence in their case, but I must tel.l your Lordships th~t radar plays more tncks even tkm the camera, and I do not believe thc:t rad2tr info;rnation in this con~ext! is •:aEd. For example, 'the recent s1ghtmgs m New Ze<lland, which were widely reported just before Christmas including so~~ n:;ther strange-looking photographs. wmch appeai·ed on television, were al.so sa1d t? have ~~en confirmed by radar mformat10n wlucn was available to the aircraft in question. But I know from my own experience that radar is frequently used, and, ind<:;;d, is so designed, for detecting anomalies in atmospheric conditions :!nd in we::;.thtr patterns, and I am not persuaded that radar is a valid supporting argument in this case. Since time immemorial, man has as- cribed t!10se phenomena that he could not explain to some supernatural or extra- terrestrial agents. Ev~ntually, as scientific wisdom has advanced, these phenomena are understood more fully, until now today, no one takes witchcraft seriously and there are no fairies at the bottom of my &arden. .It is not so long ago that magnetism, as It occurs naturally in the form of lodestone, was thought to be the I.work of the Devil, as indeed were some of the hot springs found in Iceland, Australia and elsewhere. I An eclipse of the sun or the moon · now fully understood, was once thought t<? be an expression of. the Almighty's displeasure. Perhaps this derives from the description in the Gospels of the events following the Crucifixion. I recall the 44th and 45th verses of the 23rd chapter of St. Luke's Gospel, and I shall read it ifl may: - " And it was about the sixth hour, and there was a darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour. And the sun was darkened, and the veil of the temple vvas rent in the midst ". St. Matthew described it rather well aiso: . "A~d, behold, the veil of the temple was ·rent m twam from the top to the bottom· and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent". ' ,.;. '' ·--' ('

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 492 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.