..~ say that in the Air Force, for tne moment, they have never seemed to
come directly under air defence.
.
I- If you were asked, for example, to oake a few of your radars. available to
a few scientists, or at least the observations made by the radar operators,
what would be your reply?
MG- Oh, I would reply that we have no reason not to inform air defence, if
there were anomalies on the r~dars, of the elements which ~f air defence does
not manage to explain everything, I think that air defence wo'ltld be bound to
rep~rt these unusual or unorthodox observations to a scientific authority
which would be entrusted with them. That is what we do at the moment since I
have there all the reports of observations which could be, which come from the
Air Force, the gendarmerie, from all the.military authorities and we pnss them
on very directly.
I- Well., you have mentioned the Gendarmerie. France Inter listeners have
already heard many reports from gendarmes, offering the good faith of witnesses
when these witnesses state, not that they have seen unidentified luminous
phenomena in the sky which can always act~ly be interpreted as something
unsubstantial, but unknown by our natural science, but ouch more exact
phenomena, since there are landings with traces left in the ground. And the
gendarmes conclude them in favour of the good faith of the witnesses who state
they have seen, not only UFO land~gs sometimes, but little creatures.
MG- Ah, well, on this matter, I shall be a great deal more cautious. But I
must say that if your listeners could see the collection of reports from the
genda1'1Derie - Air Gendarmerie, mobile gendamex·ie, gen~erie responsible for
~·
territorial inq,lir:ies - which have been passed on to the National Centre for
4