Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth (hearing transcript)

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability · 2024-11-13 · 52 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of a joint hearing held November 13, 2024 by two subcommittees of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, chaired by Rep. Nancy Mace. The witnesses were Tim Gallaudet, Luis Elizondo, Michael Shellenberger and Michael Gold. They addressed government secrecy, AARO's transparency, a Pentagon document on the alleged Immaculate Constellation program, threats to pilot safety, and UAP activity near nuclear and military sites. Members also discussed UAP disclosure legislation.

  • p. 7 …And, in fact, I would add it is critical that we all con- tinue to work…
  • p. 8 …Now, I am proud to say this hearing will build on that important bipartisan work, and…
  • p. 9 …It is very important that we show that Democrats and Repub- licans in Congress can work…
  • p. 10 …I look forward to working with Members of Congress to see if this legislation and other…
  • p. 11 …I personally have worked with multiple Members of this Com- mittee, but I want to particularly…
  • p. 16 …Al- though, much of my government work on the UAP subject still re- mains classified, excessive…
  • p. 21 17 During my work on the UAP independent study team, it quickly became evident that there…
  • p. 24 …I do not know if my fellow witness might want to—he did yeoman’s work…
  • p. 26 …Some people would label you as a member of the deep state since you worked in…
  • p. 29 …I had the privilege and honor of working with him myself several years ago at U…
  • p. 34 …I do not know if many of you have worked with engineers or scientists; they love…
  • p. 40 …Elizondo, you said in your report and your testimony today, ‘‘Government work on UAP subjects still…
  • p. 46 …Elizondo worked, led by Jay Stratton, who had the first comprehensive, whole-of-government approach to…
  • p. 48 …Government or private contractors, do they work with other foreign countries—China, for example—to ex…
  • p. 49 …Lockheed Martin and others do quite a bit of work both in our atmosphere, in space…
4
I also want to note that today’s hearing builds on a quite, I
think, also historic public hearing that we had many months ago
that Mr. Grothman and others help lead in this very same hearing
room where I believe we began a really important public conversa-
tion about UAPs. And so, I want to thank him for that, and I espe-
cially want to thank Chairwoman Mace for her continued advocacy
on this topic.
I also want to start with some facts. We know that there are ob-
jects or phenomena observed in our airspace, as our witnesses will
testify, and also, possibly, in our oceans. In many cases, we do not
know what they are, and, of course, this is why we are discussing
UAPs.
Now, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, AARO, has re-
ported hundreds of UAPs that remain, quote, ‘‘uncharacterized and
unattributed’’ and which, quote, ‘‘appear to have demonstrated un-
usual flight characteristics or performance capabilities and require
further analysis.’’ This is our own AARO office.
Now, we should not prejudge what they might be. I am certainly
not going to. We need evidence. But we are detecting things, and
we know that we do not understand them, and this is worth inves-
tigating.
The American people have legitimate questions, and I believe it
is critical that Congress should help address them. This is about
the truth, and science and facts.
Now, transparency and faith in our institutions is vital in a good
democracy. Now, I am proud to say this hearing will build on that
important bipartisan work, and I want to thank everyone from
being involved, including Members of our Committee.
Now, in our last hearing in July, we heard testimony that a sig-
nificant number of pilots of major airlines have witnessed UAPs as
well, but have no real confidential way of reporting them to the
government. We heard that commercial pilots, when encountering
UAPs, may be hesitant to speak openly due to stigma or fear of re-
taliation.
We also know that AARO has reported that, and I want to quote,
that ‘‘most reports still reflect a bias toward restricted military air-
space, a result of reporting from military personnel, and sensors
presence in such areas.’’ And so, the lack of ability for civilian pi-
lots raises real safety concerns and limits our ability to understand
UAPs. This is a particular piece of this conversation that I am very
interested in.
Now, our last hearing inspired us to introduce the Safe Airspace
for Americans Act, joined by Chairman Grothman, Chairwoman
Mace, and a bipartisan group of cosponsors. I see some of our lead-
ers from Safe Airspace for Americans Act here. And that would cre-
ate a safe reporting for the UAP process, which we want to con-
tinue to do.
Now, Members of both parties and senior officials in multiple ad-
ministrations have now taken an interest in this issue. Mainstream
media, in many cases, are beginning to take more of an interest in
this issue, and we should all be proud to carry that work and build
confidence for the American people.

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 52 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.