Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth (hearing transcript)

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability · 2024-11-13 · 52 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of a joint hearing held November 13, 2024 by two subcommittees of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, chaired by Rep. Nancy Mace. The witnesses were Tim Gallaudet, Luis Elizondo, Michael Shellenberger and Michael Gold. They addressed government secrecy, AARO's transparency, a Pentagon document on the alleged Immaculate Constellation program, threats to pilot safety, and UAP activity near nuclear and military sites. Members also discussed UAP disclosure legislation.

  • p. 7 …And, in fact, I would add it is critical that we all con- tinue to work…
  • p. 8 …Now, I am proud to say this hearing will build on that important bipartisan work, and…
  • p. 9 …It is very important that we show that Democrats and Repub- licans in Congress can work…
  • p. 10 …I look forward to working with Members of Congress to see if this legislation and other…
  • p. 11 …I personally have worked with multiple Members of this Com- mittee, but I want to particularly…
  • p. 16 …Al- though, much of my government work on the UAP subject still re- mains classified, excessive…
  • p. 21 17 During my work on the UAP independent study team, it quickly became evident that there…
  • p. 24 …I do not know if my fellow witness might want to—he did yeoman’s work…
  • p. 26 …Some people would label you as a member of the deep state since you worked in…
  • p. 29 …I had the privilege and honor of working with him myself several years ago at U…
  • p. 34 …I do not know if many of you have worked with engineers or scientists; they love…
  • p. 40 …Elizondo, you said in your report and your testimony today, ‘‘Government work on UAP subjects still…
  • p. 46 …Elizondo worked, led by Jay Stratton, who had the first comprehensive, whole-of-government approach to…
  • p. 48 …Government or private contractors, do they work with other foreign countries—China, for example—to ex…
  • p. 49 …Lockheed Martin and others do quite a bit of work both in our atmosphere, in space…
33
Mrs. LUNA. Uh-huh.
Do any of you ever come across reports from people that claim
to have firsthand experiences with these entities, whatever they
might be, or these aircraft and then, as a result, whether or not
they are religious, find that these things will automatically dis-
appear?
Anyone? This is open to any of you on the panel. So, just real
quick, because I am running out of time.
Lue?
Mr. ELIZONDO. Ma’am, I have always been a nuts-and-bolts kind
of guy. When I was at AATIP, I was focusing more on the perform-
ance characteristics and less on the potential occupants.
Mrs. LUNA. OK.
The reason I ask is because it seems like, just based on our con-
versations, that we have had people that say that there are good
and bad of whatever these things are.
And so, my concern from a national security perspective is, A, is
that true? B, are you guys hearing reports of that?
And, C, I think moving forward in regard to technology—Mr.
Gold, if you can answer this real quickly—some of these aircraft,
it seems that they are operating off of energy that we do not cur-
rently have.
But just yes or no, in your opinion, if we were able to obtain that,
would that impact humanity for the better or negative?
Mr. GOLD. It would certainly save us some money on funding on
Artemis.
And——
Mrs. LUNA. Definitely.
Mr. GOLD [continuing]. This is a national security issue, that if
there is such technology out there, we are not the only country that
might have access to it. We do not want to be on the wrong end
of technological surprise.
Mrs. LUNA. OK.
Thank you guys for your time.
Ms. MACE. All right. Thank you.
I will now recognize Mr. Garcia for 5 minutes.
Mr. GARCIA. Thank you.
And I apologize for stepping out. My Governor is here, upstairs.
So, I am going, trying to get in between meetings, so apologize for
that.
I want to just start by just asking everyone on the panel, our wit-
nesses—and I had a chance to read all the testimony before. But
just to set the agenda, just if you can go down real briefly, do you
believe, just for the record, that the Federal Government, any part
of the Federal Government, is knowingly concealing evidence about
UAPs from the public?
Dr. GALLAUDET. Yes, sir.
Mr. ELIZONDO. One hundred percent.
Mr. SHELLENBERGER. Yes.
Mr. GOLD. Yes.
Mr. GARCIA. Thank you.
I also want to just go down the line—and I know many of you
have already said this, but I just—for the record, again, just brief-
ly: What do you believe UAPs could be or are?

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 52 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.