Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth (hearing transcript)

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability · 2024-11-13 · 52 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of a joint hearing held November 13, 2024 by two subcommittees of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, chaired by Rep. Nancy Mace. The witnesses were Tim Gallaudet, Luis Elizondo, Michael Shellenberger and Michael Gold. They addressed government secrecy, AARO's transparency, a Pentagon document on the alleged Immaculate Constellation program, threats to pilot safety, and UAP activity near nuclear and military sites. Members also discussed UAP disclosure legislation.

  • p. 4 …Michael Gold, Former NASA Associate Administrator of Space Policy and Partnerships, Member of NASA UAP Independent…
  • p. 13 …Michael Gold, a former NASA official who was also a member of the NASA UAP inde…
  • p. 16 …Currently, the White House, CIA, NASA, the Pentagon, Depart-
  • p. 20 16 STATEMENT OF MICHAEL GOLD FORMER NASA ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR SPACE POLICY AND PARTNERSHIPS AND MEMBER OF…
  • p. 21 …In order to effectively collect UAP data, the independent study team recommended the use of NASA…
  • p. 24 …Gold, did the NASA independent study team get briefed on what you call AAWSAP? Very quickly…
  • p. 33 …During a hearing, NASA Administrator Nelson affirmed the importance of NASA in helping us to understand…
  • p. 34 …As I described, NASA has whole archives of data, much of which, I be- lieve, will…
  • p. 35 …And relative to science, Congressman, if I can say, when NASA studies black holes, when NASA…
  • p. 38 …Gold, in your testimony, you discuss NASA’s Aviation Safety Reporting System, a confidential, nonpunitive reporting…
22
Mr. ELIZONDO. It was an option, but they probably would not
have allowed me to because the document itself was pretty explicit
about you have to be—you are putting me in an interesting—let me
try to thread the needle here.
There are certain documents that we have in the U.S. Govern-
ment that allow people to have access to certain programs, whether
it is a specialized—I am being very generic here—whether it is a
special access program or controlled access program, SAP, CAP,
whatnot.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. How many people have to sign that document?
Mr. ELIZONDO. It depends how many people are going to get ac-
cess to the information, sir.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. OK.
Last question. Doctor, real quick, can you tell us about the
Omaha incident in greater detail? I have read your background,
right. Some people would label you as a member of the deep state
since you worked in government for a long period of time.
But can you tell us more about that incident? You have written
a lot about that.
Dr. GALLAUDET. I wrote a lot about incidents like it, Congress-
man, but that specific incident involved the USS Omaha, the tour
combat ship of the U.S. Navy operating off of Southern California.
I do not remember the exact date. It was within the last decade,
but what the watch standers on the bridge observed was a UAP.
Again, something that was aloft but had no observable exhaust or
control surfaces. So, it was something that could not be explained.
And then they saw it enter the water from the atmosphere and
going through the air/sea interface and so, thus, exhibiting
transmedium travel.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Thank you.
I yield back.
Ms. MACE. Thank you.
I will now recognize Mr. Grothman for 5 minutes of questioning.
Mr. GROTHMAN. Yes, we will start with Mr. Gallaudet. During a
previous UAP hearing, Navy Commander David Fravor discussed
the Tic Tac object engaged in 2004. Are you familiar with the inci-
dent, the Tic Tac incident?
Dr. GALLAUDET. Yes, sir.
Mr. GROTHMAN. That is almost 20 years ago, right?
Dr. GALLAUDET. Yes, sir.
Mr. GROTHMAN. It has been said there are more videos, docu-
ments, and reports related to this incident. Do you believe the in-
formation regarding the Tic Tac incident should be available to all
Members of Congress?
In your expertise, what reason would the Department of Defense
possibly have for not releasing information that is over 20 years
old?
Dr. GALLAUDET. Thank you, Congressman.
I do not think there is any good reason to withhold information
and important data, especially of a national security concern, from
Congress.
Mr. GROTHMAN. Well, what would they say?

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 52 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.