Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth (hearing transcript)

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability · 2024-11-13 · 52 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of a joint hearing held November 13, 2024 by two subcommittees of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, chaired by Rep. Nancy Mace. The witnesses were Tim Gallaudet, Luis Elizondo, Michael Shellenberger and Michael Gold. They addressed government secrecy, AARO's transparency, a Pentagon document on the alleged Immaculate Constellation program, threats to pilot safety, and UAP activity near nuclear and military sites. Members also discussed UAP disclosure legislation.

  • p. 5 …Without objection, the Chair may declare a recess at any time, and I recognize myself for…
  • p. 6 …The reality is, despite their enormous taxpayer-funded budgets, the transparency of the Defense Department and…
  • p. 7 …it in real time now, and Mr. Burchett will enter it into the record, but 12…
  • p. 9 …Since then, the Joint Chiefs have implemented standards for UAP reporting across the services. The intelligence…
  • p. 12 …In the time of heightened distrust of our government institutions, I believe more transparency is not…
  • p. 14 …At the time, my personnel were par- ticipating in a predeployment naval exercise off the U…
  • p. 15 …others to do the same, and it is my hope over time that a number of…
  • p. 17 …and help restore the American public’s trust at a time when the public’s trust…
  • p. 18 …authorization for some time, quite possibly decades. Furthermore, these individuals have revealed the name of an…
  • p. 19 …The Pentagon, the intelligence community is treating us like chil- dren. It is time for us…
  • p. 23 …That is a crazy idea, right? The hypocrisy and the logic. OK. Mr. Shellenberger, I am…
  • p. 24 …And the more extraordinary those discoveries, the more extraordinary those new beliefs, it is very difficult…
  • p. 26 …of the deep state since you worked in government for a long period of time. But…
  • p. 29 …working with former leadership of AARO at the time as well. Mr. BURCHETT. And we punish…
  • p. 36 …the human body can withstand about 9 g-forces for a short period of time be…
  • p. 37 …on the panel. So, just real quick, because I am running out of time. Lue? Mr…
  • p. 39 …just briefly, as I close my time, explain why the UAP Disclosure Act would be critical…
  • p. 40 …I think at the time when this first—this reality became evident to the U.S…
  • p. 41 37 There is also, then, the philosophical argument that the Depart- ment of Defense and the…
  • p. 42 …the government, as well as the inability to get people classifica- tions in a timely and…
  • p. 43 …The problem is, the supposed collection of these biologi- cal samples occurred before my time, in…
  • p. 45 …To the rest of the panel, was the Wall Street Jour- nal article the first time…
  • p. 46 …I am running out of time. The last thing is that we need authori- ties. Law…
  • p. 48 …Nothing beyond what is in the report and then the specific case that I mentioned with…
  • p. 50 …be like us, and every time we look out into the universe, we are humbled relative…
  • p. 51 …any- where in the world. So, Mr. Ogles, you are just in time, babe. I will…
  • p. 52 …This UAP issue may be the greatest issue of our time, and it is being hid…
21
Mr. ELIZONDO. I will say the Department of Defense. Unfortu-
nately, I cannot say in this forum much more than that.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. You specifically said the document said you can-
not talk about crash retrieval. Well, you know, you cannot talk
about fight club if there is no fight club.
Mr. ELIZONDO. Correct.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. OK. I am just making an observation.
Mr. ELIZONDO. Yes, sir.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. So, that document that you signed that you said
exists specifically said you cannot talk about crash retrieval?
Mr. ELIZONDO. Correct, sir. It was a limitation on what I—be-
cause already I had been speaking publicly about the topic, and so
the document said, ‘‘You can continue saying X, Y, Z, but you can-
not discuss the topic of crash retrieval.’’
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Give me the atmosphere of signing this docu-
ment. You are in a room by yourself?
Mr. ELIZONDO. I am in a SCIF with a security officer, sir.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Just one on one? Anybody else?
Mr. ELIZONDO. There may have been an assistant as well. It was
in a SCIF within a Department of Defense facility.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Give me your background real quick.
Mr. ELIZONDO. My background is I went to school to study micro-
biology and immunology. I entered into the U.S. Army, and after
a very short stint in military intelligence, I became a counterintel-
ligence special agent as a civilian. Later on, I became a special
agent in charge, running investigations and counter terrorism and
counter espionage primarily with some experience in counter insur-
gency and counter narcotics.
And then, in 2009 timeframe, when I came back to the Pentagon
after a tour with the Director of National Intelligence, I quickly be-
came part of a program that was originally called AAWSAP. That
evolved into the program now called AATIP, which is where those
videos that we now see, the GOFAST, the GIMBAL, the FLIR, that
was part of our effort, sir.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Right. So, you are not some conspiracy theorist.
You actually have a legitimate background.
Mr. ELIZONDO. Well, sir, I am certainly not a conspiracy theorist.
I am fact-based, just a fact——
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. So, when you are in this room—I want to paint
the picture for everybody. You are in this room. You are by your-
self. You are in the SCIF. You are handed a document. How long
is the document?
Mr. ELIZONDO. It is about a page front and back. So, basically,
you have some things they call trigraphs, which I cannot, again,
talk——
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. How long were you given to sign the document?
Mr. ELIZONDO. As long as I needed, sir.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. And what if you did not sign it?
Mr. ELIZONDO. Well, I suspect there would be repercussions. I
would not have access to certain information.
Mr. MOSKOWITZ. Were you allowed to conduct—ask a lawyer or
you were not allowed to talk—you were not allowed to ask for a
lawyer to review the document?

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 52 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.