Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (hearing transcript, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation, 17 May 2022)

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence · 2022-05-17 · 53 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the transcript of the open session of a hearing on unidentified aerial phenomena, held on 17 May 2022 by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence's Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation. Under Secretary Ronald Moultrie and Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence Scott Bray testified on the new AOIMSG office, efforts to reduce stigma in reporting, and a UAP database of about 400 reports. Bray showed videos, explained flashing triangles as drones seen through night vision goggles, and called the 2004 Nimitz incident unresolved.

44
the root cause of what is happening here and report on that, and then feed that back into
our national security apparatus so we are able to protect the American people and our
allies. So it is harmful. It is hurtful, but hopefully, if we get more information out
there, we will start to lessen the impact of some of those spurious reports?
Mr. LaHood. So, just taking that a step further, that misinformation, false
narratives, manufactured -- so what are the consequences? Are there legal
consequences? Are there examples that you can give us where people have been held
accountable by this misinformation or disinformation?
Mr. Moultrie. I can't give you, you know, any examples where somebody has
been legally held liable for putting something out there, but --
Mr. LaHood. Well, I guess, what is the deterrent from people engaging in this
activity?
Mr. Moultrie. I don't know. I don't have that answer. That is something that,
you know -- I would welcome a dialogue with Congress to talk about that with the
Members who, you know, helped legislate those laws to say, what should be the legal
ramifications that we could use to potentially hold individuals accountable, whether the
citizens or information that might be injected into our media by other forces or other
countries, if you will?
Mr. LaHood. And, in terms of DOD's review and analysis in this field, I mean, is
there a standard in place when it comes to UAPs? I mean, is there any guidance you
look to that is codified in law or otherwise within DOD that kind of sets out the standard
for UAPs and what to look for?
Mr. Moultrie. I think that is part of what the group the group that we are
standing up now would be chartered to do. We are actually -- from my organization, we
will be looking at policies and standards that we have to come to you and work with you

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 53 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.