Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Laser Lightcraft Nanosatellites

Defense Intelligence Agency · 77 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated 1 November 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It describes nanosatellite technologies and proposes launching nanosats into orbit with laser Lightcraft propulsion. It also covers a weapon mission selection study and multi-megawatt laser options. The author recommends that the Department of Defense and NASA bring Lightcraft R&D back to the United States and restart the X-50LR flight demonstration program.

  • p. 4 …Influence of Target Velocity and Intercept Angle on Impact Energy and Required Mass .................................................................................................. 33 Table 5…
  • p. 5 …The term "minisatellite" refers to a spacecraft with a wet mass (including onboard propellant) of 100…
  • p. 7 …Nanosatellite Technologies OVERVIEW Nanosats require technologies that radically reduce the mass and power of components without…
  • p. 8 …nanosat presents some unique challenges, with low mass (0.25 kg) and low power (0.5…
  • p. 9 …In order to develop a low mass C&DH, a lightweight and low power electronics packaging…
  • p. 11 …RF COMMUNICATIONS The onboard RF subsystem must be small, low mass, and low power. The system…
  • p. 12 …additional strain on an already challenged nanosat mass and power budget. For this reason, the concept…
  • p. 13 …The material will be selected based on mass, cost, manufacturability, ease of assembly and integration, and…
  • p. 15 …for the spacecraft because a large propellant mass and heavy energy source are not carried onboard…
  • p. 17 …Current Lightcraft designs are limited to about 60 g mass and 15 cm in diameter by…
  • p. 21 …It requires a beam power of 0.1 to 1 MW per kg of vehicle mass…
  • p. 22 …The majority of the system mass required to launch a payload to orbit is left on…
  • p. 24 …Therefore, this would allow approximately 4 kg of mass to be placed into orbit with the…
  • p. 25 …same ply-thickness) to meet Lightcraft airframe mass requirements. Another important finding in the study was…
  • p. 31 …Additional estimated mass for performing the Lightsat function is no more than about 1 kg, if…
  • p. 32 …Lightcraft takeoff masses no more than about 20 kg can be accelerated to orbital velocities by…
  • p. 33 …for missile and maneuvering aircraft interception. • Additional mass along Lightcraft centerline for hardened target penetration. LIGHTCRAFT…
  • p. 34 …Lightcraft sizing assumed a propellant mass fraction of 0.5 and 1.0 MW of laser…
  • p. 35 …Hybrid Rocket Expendible Launch Vehicle - Assumed Perfonnance and Estimated Weights Payload Mass (kg) 1.00 5…
  • p. 37 …It is therefore estimated that the air-to-space Lightcraft dry mass would be about the…
  • p. 38 …Influence of Target Velocity and Intercept Angle on Impact Energy and Required Mass 2 61. Lightcraft…
  • p. 39 …Influence of Lightcraft and Target Velocity on Impact Energy and Required Mass 261. Lightcraft Lightcraft Impact…
  • p. 40 …The lower mass also saves launch costs, so the total system costs less for the same…
  • p. 41 …many spacecraft that the economics of true mass production will come into play in space for…
  • p. 44 …the local vertical, with its center of mass in GEO. The Fresnel zone plate has a…
  • p. 46 …wall plug and optical efficiencies, cost, complexity, mass, and size. Free-electron lasers are another class…
  • p. 47 …P = 2000 Pa (or 0.02 atmospheres). • Mass flow rate, Q = 60 kg/sec per module…
  • p. 48 UNCLASSIFIED//509 AEEJCJOP 11£5 O.-blf + Total mass flow rate, Qtota1 = 240 kg/sec for…
  • p. 50 …sec, and 15 kg/sec of CD2 mass flow represents 2.053 x 1026 molecules/sec…
  • p. 51 …The 60 kg/sec mass flow requirement of the 3: 1 N2/C02 lasing gases means…
  • p. 53 …mass (not including the prime power and cooling systems) to achieve the low specific mass (5…
  • p. 65 …is the undulator period, mis the electron mass, and c is the speed of light. 'MeV…
  • p. 72 …The Lightcraft specific impulse is essentially infinite (several thousand seconds in rocket mode), while payload mass…
UNCLASSIFIED//F8~ 8FFlfil1l1k Wliilii &Hkl:f
The total cost for an installed 10 MW power oscillator-based laser transmitter is
estimated as follows [29]:
• 2.5 MW Prototype= $80.0 Million.
• 3 x 2.5 MW Additional Modules+ 4 Module Integration = $133.0 Million.
• Buildings/Installations~ $17.0 Million.
• Total Installed & Integrated Transmitter Cost~ $230 Million.
And the additional costs for the MOPA-based transmitters and cold-flow assessment are
[29]:
• 4 Master Oscillators~ $20.0 Million.
• Cold-Flow Subscale Upgrades & Evaluations~ $5.0 Million.
• Total Additional Cost ~ $25.0 Million.
The TEXTRON Systems study concluded that [29]:
• A pulsed CO2 repetitively pulsed transmitter, which uses a 300 second blow down
and beam combining, can provide the power levels and energies needed for
Lightcraft propulsion applications.
• Spectral tailoring of the beam and mountain-top operation should provide
reasonable atmospheric transmission of the high pulsed-power laser beam.
• Low cost operation is achievable with helium-free gas mixtures, which use N2,
CO2, and small quantities of H2.
• Subscale testing will be used to anchor the design and thus reduce risk.
• Legacy programs support many aspects of this approach.
• Growth potential with cold-flow and aero windows should double the beam power
output.
• Current pulsed CO2 laser technology blow down configuration is postured to
provide power levels for propulsion of kilogram-sized spacecraft into orbit.
Payload Cost Estimate for Lightcraft Launch Using a 10 MW CO2/Gas
Mixture Laser
Froning and Davis [26] used a proposed 10 MW electron gun-driven N2/CO2/H2 laser
design to estimate the Lightcraft payload launch cost per kilogram, which is described
in what follows. Each power oscillator optics module transmitting a 2.5 MW beam of
10.6 μm wavelength photons generates 1.334 x 1026 photons/sec, and 15 kg/sec of CD2
mass flow represents 2.053 x 1026 molecules/sec of gas flow. These figures taken
together mean that 1.54 CO2 molecules are required to lase one photon. A 2.5 MW
laser operating for 300 seconds of thrusting will allow us to send 5.25 kg of payload
into LEO, and the total laser energy (E1aser) output is 750 MJ. If the laser efficiency is
0.20, then we will need to use 12.5 MW of electrical power for 300 seconds (or 3,750
MJ of total energy), which, at a cost of $0.10 per kWh (or $0.0278 per MJ), gives a
total cost of $104 for the required electrical energy to launch the payload.
The kinetic energy (KE) of a Lightcraft in LEO is given by KE= 11a~yE1aser, where [26]:
46
UNCLASSIFIED/ ,'F811. 8FFll!l,'\I! l!l!il! 8111!¥

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 77 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.