Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Laser Lightcraft Nanosatellites

Defense Intelligence Agency · 77 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated 1 November 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It describes nanosatellite technologies and proposes launching nanosats into orbit with laser Lightcraft propulsion. It also covers a weapon mission selection study and multi-megawatt laser options. The author recommends that the Department of Defense and NASA bring Lightcraft R&D back to the United States and restart the X-50LR flight demonstration program.

  • p. 4 …Influence of Target Velocity and Intercept Angle on Impact Energy and Required Mass .................................................................................................. 33 Table 5…
  • p. 5 …The term "minisatellite" refers to a spacecraft with a wet mass (including onboard propellant) of 100…
  • p. 7 …Nanosatellite Technologies OVERVIEW Nanosats require technologies that radically reduce the mass and power of components without…
  • p. 8 …nanosat presents some unique challenges, with low mass (0.25 kg) and low power (0.5…
  • p. 9 …In order to develop a low mass C&DH, a lightweight and low power electronics packaging…
  • p. 11 …RF COMMUNICATIONS The onboard RF subsystem must be small, low mass, and low power. The system…
  • p. 12 …additional strain on an already challenged nanosat mass and power budget. For this reason, the concept…
  • p. 13 …The material will be selected based on mass, cost, manufacturability, ease of assembly and integration, and…
  • p. 15 …for the spacecraft because a large propellant mass and heavy energy source are not carried onboard…
  • p. 17 …Current Lightcraft designs are limited to about 60 g mass and 15 cm in diameter by…
  • p. 21 …It requires a beam power of 0.1 to 1 MW per kg of vehicle mass…
  • p. 22 …The majority of the system mass required to launch a payload to orbit is left on…
  • p. 24 …Therefore, this would allow approximately 4 kg of mass to be placed into orbit with the…
  • p. 25 …same ply-thickness) to meet Lightcraft airframe mass requirements. Another important finding in the study was…
  • p. 31 …Additional estimated mass for performing the Lightsat function is no more than about 1 kg, if…
  • p. 32 …Lightcraft takeoff masses no more than about 20 kg can be accelerated to orbital velocities by…
  • p. 33 …for missile and maneuvering aircraft interception. • Additional mass along Lightcraft centerline for hardened target penetration. LIGHTCRAFT…
  • p. 34 …Lightcraft sizing assumed a propellant mass fraction of 0.5 and 1.0 MW of laser…
  • p. 35 …Hybrid Rocket Expendible Launch Vehicle - Assumed Perfonnance and Estimated Weights Payload Mass (kg) 1.00 5…
  • p. 37 …It is therefore estimated that the air-to-space Lightcraft dry mass would be about the…
  • p. 38 …Influence of Target Velocity and Intercept Angle on Impact Energy and Required Mass 2 61. Lightcraft…
  • p. 39 …Influence of Lightcraft and Target Velocity on Impact Energy and Required Mass 261. Lightcraft Lightcraft Impact…
  • p. 40 …The lower mass also saves launch costs, so the total system costs less for the same…
  • p. 41 …many spacecraft that the economics of true mass production will come into play in space for…
  • p. 44 …the local vertical, with its center of mass in GEO. The Fresnel zone plate has a…
  • p. 46 …wall plug and optical efficiencies, cost, complexity, mass, and size. Free-electron lasers are another class…
  • p. 47 …P = 2000 Pa (or 0.02 atmospheres). • Mass flow rate, Q = 60 kg/sec per module…
  • p. 48 UNCLASSIFIED//509 AEEJCJOP 11£5 O.-blf + Total mass flow rate, Qtota1 = 240 kg/sec for…
  • p. 50 …sec, and 15 kg/sec of CD2 mass flow represents 2.053 x 1026 molecules/sec…
  • p. 51 …The 60 kg/sec mass flow requirement of the 3: 1 N2/C02 lasing gases means…
  • p. 53 …mass (not including the prime power and cooling systems) to achieve the low specific mass (5…
  • p. 65 …is the undulator period, mis the electron mass, and c is the speed of light. 'MeV…
  • p. 72 …The Lightcraft specific impulse is essentially infinite (several thousand seconds in rocket mode), while payload mass…
UNCLASSIFIED/ il"9" 91"l"!e!lltt tl!IL 9HL I
Laser Lightcraft Nanosatellites
Summary
Miniaturized satellites are spacecraft of unusually low mass and small size, usually
under 500 kg in total mass. The term "minisatellite" refers to a spacecraft with a wet
mass (including onboard propellant) of 100 kg to 500 kg. Microsatellite or "microsat" is
a spacecraft with a wet mass of 10 kg to 100 kg. Nanosatellite or "nanosat" is a
spacecraft with a wet mass below 10 kg. Picosatellite or "picosat" is a spacecraft with a
wet mass of 0.1 kg to 1.0 kg. Picosats are also called sub-nanosats.
The primary reason for miniaturizing satellites is to reduce cost. Heavier satellites
require larger launch vehicles of greater cost while smaller, lighter satellites require
smaller and cheaper launch vehicles and can sometimes be launched in multiples or
"piggyback" using excess capacity on larger launch vehicles. Miniaturized satellites
allow for cheaper designs as well as ease of mass production. However, few satellites
of any size other than communications constellations, where dozens of satellites are
used to cover the globe, have been mass produced in practice.
Besides the cost issue, the main rationale for the use of miniaturized satellites is the
opportunity to enable missions that a larger satellite cannot accomplish, such as:
• Constellations for low data rate communications.
• Using formations to gather data from multiple points.
• In-orbit inspection of larger satellites.
Many of these missions require numerous small spacecraft in a constellation or
"swarm." These include orbital communications networks and swarms of small
satellites to conduct remote sensing, and to provide unique perspectives on
astronomical bodies of interest. For instance, 100 or more nanosats could be deployed
from a mother ship to their final destination in space for deployment.
Provisions for orbital maneuvers as well as attitude control, multiple sensors, and
instruments, and full autonomy will yield a highly capable miniaturized satellite. All
onboard electronics will survive a total radiation dose rate of several hundred kilorads
over a several year mission lifetime (at least 100 kilorads over two years). Nanosats
developed for in-situ measurements will be spin-stabilized, and carry a complement of
particles and fields instruments. Nanosats developed for remote sensing measurements
(MASINT) or surveillance and eavesdropping (SIGINT) will be three-axis stabilized, and
carry a complement of imaging and radio wave instruments. Autonomy both on board
the nanosats and at the ground stations will minimize the mission operational costs for
tracking and managing a constellation.
To reduce overall mission cost, advanced technology components and a novel laser
propulsion system will be used to make nanosats and their onboard instruments
compact, lightweight, low power, low cost, and able to survive their radiation
environment over a several year lifetime. Each nanosat will be manufactured and
tested for a recurring cost not to exceed $500k. By producing a large quantity of
nanosats for a given mission, the per-unit cost will be reduced to a small fraction of
UNCLASSIFIED//F8A 8FFIQIOP !PSS ODIi Y
1

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 77 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.