Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Laser Lightcraft Nanosatellites

Defense Intelligence Agency · 77 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated 1 November 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It describes nanosatellite technologies and proposes launching nanosats into orbit with laser Lightcraft propulsion. It also covers a weapon mission selection study and multi-megawatt laser options. The author recommends that the Department of Defense and NASA bring Lightcraft R&D back to the United States and restart the X-50LR flight demonstration program.

  • p. 3 …Free-Electron Laser Electron Beam Phase-Space Evolution ....................... 59 Figure 31. Recirculating-Beam FEL System ........................................................... 60…
  • p. 4 …HEL Beam Pointer/Tracker ................................................................... 65 Figure 35. Basic Shared Aperture Beam Control System ......................................... 66 Figure 36…
  • p. 7 …This can only be achieved via laser propulsion in which the laser beam energy that is…
  • p. 15 …By launching spacecraft on a beam of electromagnetic radiation, researchers will have developed the first new…
  • p. 16 …The laser beam's pulse interacts with the mirror, spreading out and focusing into an annular…
  • p. 17 …1) power supply; 2) high-power (megawatt-class) laser beam generator/transmitter using novel beam optics…
  • p. 20 …is to the right and the laser beam strikes the stretched-out parabolic mirror/propulsion section…
  • p. 21 …It requires a beam power of 0.1 to 1 MW per kg of vehicle mass…
  • p. 22 …The ground-based megawatt-class laser beam generator is state-of-the-art technology. The cost…
  • p. 25 …Figure 8 illustrates the adverse beam propagation geometry associated with ETO laser propulsion by means of…
  • p. 26 …Attenuation Effects on Captured Laser Beam Power 261. 0.4 0.J 0.2 0.1…
  • p. 27 …Unfortunately the demonstrated laser beam power levels for the attractive 1.62 μm wavelength, which suffered…
  • p. 28 …Beam combining of several 1 MW (or higher) FELs can achieve a total combined beam output…
  • p. 31 …Appropriate rotation of a high-energy laser beam, emanating from a ground/sea-based laser, guides…
  • p. 32 …Appropriate rotation and translation of a high-energy laser beam, emanating from a moving aircraft, guides…
  • p. 33 …But multiple target interception within allowable time is limited by relatively long beam- riding time needed…
  • p. 37 …In this case, it is envisioned that the high- pulsed power within high-energy laser beams…
  • p. 39 …In this case, airborne laser beams at 12 km altitude will not suffer the significant propagation…
  • p. 41 …sidelobes, creates multiple beams, and steers the ensemble of the individual beams anywhere on Earth. The…
  • p. 42 …Each picosat is gravity- gradient stable, has a dipole array facing Earth, and a broader beam…
  • p. 43 …Commands for beam sweep delays are superimposed on the time delays of each nanosat. Each nanosat…
  • p. 44 …piezoelectric membrane kept flat by an electron beam in response to an optical figure sensor. MEMS…
  • p. 46 …technical issues include large wavelength and atmospheric absorption of the laser beam. • Carbon Monoxide (CO) Laser…
  • p. 47 …125 Hz@ 20μs. • Laser power, P = 2.5 MW/beam x 4 beams = 10 MW. • Laser…
  • p. 50 …Each power oscillator optics module transmitting a 2.5 MW beam of 10.6 μm wavelength…
  • p. 52 …Adding an eight amplifier chain that the system was designed for will increase the beam power…
  • p. 53 …However, BSSSL beam power can be scaled up further by improving presently known gain media and…
  • p. 54 …scalable to 1 MW beam power within 2 years. Typical solid-state lasers have the following…
  • p. 55 …A new technology that enables the scaling-up of BSSSL beam power is a recently developed…
  • p. 56 …at the same time increasing the average beam power. Figure 21. Phase Change Materials Allow Storage…
  • p. 57 …This exponential growth in beam output power is the result of many factors, including the parallel…
  • p. 58 …Microlens -O _ ,:1 Incoherent Beam Combining 'Ind1vidually Incoherent Gaussian Beams i=L Controlled /_/Steering • ... o~bined…
  • p. 59 …Neodymium Thulium (Tm 3+), Holmium - Range of beam wavelengths(),) produced: 0.48 μm to 2.9…
  • p. 61 …Multlmode Fiber Lasers 50kW Multimode Output beam quality BPP-1 o M"2-33 DC EDE…
  • p. 62 …The resulting laser beam photon energy depends on the electron energy, the undulator period, and (weakly…
  • p. 63 UNCLASSIFIED/ /F8~ 8FFl&I.«1k WliEii a,.klf electron beam ( \ I,:--- ■■>ti■-- undulator ) resonator mirror 0…
  • p. 64 …The superconducting accelerator gives good efficiency and gradient while recirculation of the electron beam recovers beam…
  • p. 65 UNCLASSIFIED/ /F&~ 8FFHiil.«1k 1!181! &••kY - K"' 1.5.t • Electron Beam: - Photocathode injector creates…
  • p. 66 …HIGH ENERGY LASER BEAM CONTROL ··costs could be reduced to as low as $20 per kg…
  • p. 67 …The typical HEL beam control system includes:++ 1) a gimbaled beam director, 2) tracking and pointing…
  • p. 68 UNCLASSIFIED//F&II. &FFiii,111!! l!llili &HI!¥ A novel new HEL beam control architecture being…
  • p. 69 …HEL Beam Pointer/Tracker (courtesy of the Directed Energy Professional Society). In summary, this new architecture…
  • p. 70 …The BILL is a solid-state, kilowatt-class laser that measures atmospheric conditions, allowing the beam…
  • p. 71 …All of these HEL beam control innovations can be quickly adapted to laser propulsion applications with…
  • p. 72 …The entire Lightcraft launch system is comprised of a ground, sea, or airborne laser beam generator…
  • p. 73 …New beam control devices and high-power optical train combinations have a resulting beam line that…
  • p. 75 …N. (1983), "Advanced Beamed-Energy and Field Propulsion Concepts," BDM/W-83-225-TR, BDM Corp…
  • p. 76 …N. (2001), "World Record Flights of Beam-Riding Rocket Lightcraft: Demonstration of 'Disruptive' Propulsion Technology," AIAA…
  • p. 77 …of the 6 th Int'! Symposium on Beamed Energy Propulsion, edited by C. R. Phipps, AIP…
UNCLASSIFIED/ /1"91t 9ffU!l"I!! l!l!il! 8111!!¥
ground, sea and air launches of Lightcraft to LEO with air launch occurring at either
subsonic or hypersonic speed.
Lightcraft Ground/Sea to Space Investigation
The current Air Force Lightcraft vehicle concept has been designed for not only placing
nanosats into LEO at low cost (Figure 14), but also for performing much of the nanosat
function as well. In this concept the precision optics system that focuses ground/sea-
based laser light into the Lightcra~'s cowl area for propulsion is also used as a space
telescope for viewing military targets on Earth and in space. And structural panels on
the Lightcraft forebody are also used as solar panels that are unfurled in orbit for
generation of satellite power. Thus, the current Lightcraft's design allocates only 0.1 kg
of its 1.0 kg dry mass for exclusively nanosat functions. There is a military need for 1.0
kg to 2.0 kg nanosats with optical sensors for visual inspection of unknown objects in
space and on Earth.
Since conventional expendable rockets could conceivably be an alternative to laser-
powered Lightcraft for the rapid placement of military nanosats in LEO, a cursory
comparison of Lightcraft and conventional rockets was made by Froning and Davis [26]
to get some idea of their comparative costs. Hybrid rocket sizing and costing was
based upon tactical strategic missile sizing and costing information possessed by H. D.
Froning. This information related costs (in 1982 dollars) to rocket and payload
characteristics. Lightcraft sizing assumed a propellant mass fraction of 0.5 and 1.0 MW
of laser power per pound of payload (dry mass) placed into orbit. Costs for laser power
and refurbishment were based upon AFRL estimates (amortized over a fewer number of
flights). Although these Lightcraft and laser costs are higher (based upon much fewer
flights) than those of previous AFRL estimates, they are believed to be consistent with
the conventional rocket costs, and therefore applicable for relative cost comparisons.
More detailed future Lightcraft/conventional rocket designs and cost comparisons are,
of course, needed before a strong argument can be made for either design.
Shown in Table 2 is the estimated performance and weights (masses) for 3-stage
hybrid rocket launch vehicles and single-stage laser-powered launch vehicles that are
capable of placing nanosats of 1.0 kg, 5.0 kg, and 10 kg into LEO. And Table 3 shows
estimated costs for hybrid rockets and laser-powered Lightcraft assuming 100 flights
over a 10-year period. These estimated costs indicate that Lightcraft could boost
nanosats in the 2.0 kg to 5.0 kg range into LEO at about 1/lOth to l/5th the cost of
expendable rockets. But Lightcraft cost superiority over conventional rockets is less
overwhelming for satellites that are significantly heavier. Thus Lightcraft appear
extremely attractive for satellite delivery missions only if Lightcraft dry masses,
including the satellites being carried, are less than about 5.0 kg.
30
UNCLASSIFIED/ /1"91t 91"1"1!1"1!! 1!181! e,11a~·

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 77 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.