Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Laser Lightcraft Nanosatellites

Defense Intelligence Agency · 77 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated 1 November 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It describes nanosatellite technologies and proposes launching nanosats into orbit with laser Lightcraft propulsion. It also covers a weapon mission selection study and multi-megawatt laser options. The author recommends that the Department of Defense and NASA bring Lightcraft R&D back to the United States and restart the X-50LR flight demonstration program.

  • p. 4 …Influence of Target Velocity and Intercept Angle on Impact Energy and Required Mass .................................................................................................. 33 Table 5…
  • p. 5 …The term "minisatellite" refers to a spacecraft with a wet mass (including onboard propellant) of 100…
  • p. 7 …Nanosatellite Technologies OVERVIEW Nanosats require technologies that radically reduce the mass and power of components without…
  • p. 8 …nanosat presents some unique challenges, with low mass (0.25 kg) and low power (0.5…
  • p. 9 …In order to develop a low mass C&DH, a lightweight and low power electronics packaging…
  • p. 11 …RF COMMUNICATIONS The onboard RF subsystem must be small, low mass, and low power. The system…
  • p. 12 …additional strain on an already challenged nanosat mass and power budget. For this reason, the concept…
  • p. 13 …The material will be selected based on mass, cost, manufacturability, ease of assembly and integration, and…
  • p. 15 …for the spacecraft because a large propellant mass and heavy energy source are not carried onboard…
  • p. 17 …Current Lightcraft designs are limited to about 60 g mass and 15 cm in diameter by…
  • p. 21 …It requires a beam power of 0.1 to 1 MW per kg of vehicle mass…
  • p. 22 …The majority of the system mass required to launch a payload to orbit is left on…
  • p. 24 …Therefore, this would allow approximately 4 kg of mass to be placed into orbit with the…
  • p. 25 …same ply-thickness) to meet Lightcraft airframe mass requirements. Another important finding in the study was…
  • p. 31 …Additional estimated mass for performing the Lightsat function is no more than about 1 kg, if…
  • p. 32 …Lightcraft takeoff masses no more than about 20 kg can be accelerated to orbital velocities by…
  • p. 33 …for missile and maneuvering aircraft interception. • Additional mass along Lightcraft centerline for hardened target penetration. LIGHTCRAFT…
  • p. 34 …Lightcraft sizing assumed a propellant mass fraction of 0.5 and 1.0 MW of laser…
  • p. 35 …Hybrid Rocket Expendible Launch Vehicle - Assumed Perfonnance and Estimated Weights Payload Mass (kg) 1.00 5…
  • p. 37 …It is therefore estimated that the air-to-space Lightcraft dry mass would be about the…
  • p. 38 …Influence of Target Velocity and Intercept Angle on Impact Energy and Required Mass 2 61. Lightcraft…
  • p. 39 …Influence of Lightcraft and Target Velocity on Impact Energy and Required Mass 261. Lightcraft Lightcraft Impact…
  • p. 40 …The lower mass also saves launch costs, so the total system costs less for the same…
  • p. 41 …many spacecraft that the economics of true mass production will come into play in space for…
  • p. 44 …the local vertical, with its center of mass in GEO. The Fresnel zone plate has a…
  • p. 46 …wall plug and optical efficiencies, cost, complexity, mass, and size. Free-electron lasers are another class…
  • p. 47 …P = 2000 Pa (or 0.02 atmospheres). • Mass flow rate, Q = 60 kg/sec per module…
  • p. 48 UNCLASSIFIED//509 AEEJCJOP 11£5 O.-blf + Total mass flow rate, Qtota1 = 240 kg/sec for…
  • p. 50 …sec, and 15 kg/sec of CD2 mass flow represents 2.053 x 1026 molecules/sec…
  • p. 51 …The 60 kg/sec mass flow requirement of the 3: 1 N2/C02 lasing gases means…
  • p. 53 …mass (not including the prime power and cooling systems) to achieve the low specific mass (5…
  • p. 65 …is the undulator period, mis the electron mass, and c is the speed of light. 'MeV…
  • p. 72 …The Lightcraft specific impulse is essentially infinite (several thousand seconds in rocket mode), while payload mass…
UNCLASSIFIED//F&II. &FFll!IAI! l!l!il! 9Hl:Y
plastic; fiber reinforced plastic; flat stock composite construction; and carbon
nanotubes (a.k.a. "Buckytubes") or carbon nanotubes composited with other materials.
The material will be selected based on mass, cost, manufacturability, ease of assembly
and integration, and suitability for the space environment.
Streamlined testing is needed for up to 100 or 1000 nanosats per mission. Performing
a complete test program on each unit would be prohibitively expensive and time
consuming. We need to reduce the quantity of testing required while assuring product
quality to meet program cost and schedule goals. Lot testing and statistical quality
control methods should be developed to verify quality and structural performance by
testing a small subset of the total number of nanosats.
INSTRUMENTS
Instruments for in-situ and remote measurements must be miniaturized to fit within the
mass and volume constraints of a nanosat. Power consumption must also be scaled
down accordingly. Instrument sensitivities cannot be compromised in the process.
Instrument electronics need to be combined with nanosat subsystem electronics to
achieve higher degrees of integration yielding reduced mass and volume. Instrument
software will be designed to evaluate the onboard data and adjust instrument data
rates and modes to efficiently capture the data of highest priority.
GROUND SYSTEMS
The large number of nanosats in a constellation is a challenge to the ground system in
getting all of the data to the users. In a typical baseline mission, there are times when
up to ten (or more) nanosats would be within communications range of a ground
station at a single time. A minimal model for the ground station contacts shows that
they can support a nanosat constellation with only two ground stations located on
opposite sides of the Earth. The schedulers will prioritize the contacts, with the
nanosats in the higher period orbits getting priority. Nanosats in the lower period orbits
have more opportunities to dump their data, and therefore can have lower priority
without risking any data loss.
Since the nanosats are autonomous, the operations concept for a mission requires only
a few operators to determine the nanosat orbits, schedule the ground stations, and to
investigate anomalies on the spacecraft. Automated systems will monitor the
housekeeping data from the spacecraft and they will flag problems for the spacecraft
engineers to investigate. The large number of nanosats allows the risk management to
be different for this mission than for single spacecraft missions.
Except for commands to initiate the data downlink, the ground system will not
command the nanosats for normal operations. The only commands that the ground
system sends would be program loads to resolve or work around problems and failures.
The large number of nanosats in a constellation is a configuration control challenge for
the data tracking, the schedules, the command loads, the science or intelligence data,
and the engineering data. The ground system will use IDs, colorcoded user interfaces,
and other techniques to ensure that the operators and users can keep track of the data
UNCLASSIFIED/ /FOR QFFlil.ltk 11181!!! 8HLY
9

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 77 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.