Documents / Report

Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (the Condon Report, complete, three volumes)

University of Colorado · 1969-01 · 1497 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the final report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, conducted by the University of Colorado under Air Force contract F44620-67-C-0035, with Edward U. Condon as scientific director and Daniel S. Gillmor as editor. It was submitted to the National Academy of Sciences on 15 November 1968 for review. The report includes field studies, photographic and radar analyses, case studies, historical chapters and appendices such as the Robertson Panel report and the Twining letter.

an evpryJay explanation avai:able to them.
We sought to hold to a minimum delay', in ~lrriving at the sit;;" of
an uro report, even where it was clear that 't was going to b~ impossi-
ble to get there in time actually to see the r~ported UFO. Once an
observer made a report, the fact of his having done so usually becomes
known to friends and neighbors, local new'5papermcp, and local Ui;O
enthusiasts. The witness becomes the center of attention and will
u~uall)' have told his story over and over aguin to such Ii steners, before
th(' field teall\ \~an arrivE'. With e:lch telling of the story it j:;, apt
tD he- varied 1 tors fron outer space that \"as probabl~'
not there in the first telling.
Al\other kind of diffio-ulty arises in interviewing mUltipL, associ-
ated \dtl1esse~, that is, \~ltlles~es who were together :l't tIL) time that
all of tlw11I ~ought to hold to a mini!l\um delay', in "x-riving at the sit" of
an UFO report, even where it was clear that 'l was going to br impossi-
ble to get !here in time actually to see the r:ported UFO. Once an
observer made a report, the fact of his having done so usually becomes
known to friends and neighbors, 10.:a 1 new',papermep, and local Ui:O
enthusiasts, T~e witness becomes the center of attention and wjll
usually have told his ,,, \VI.' all like t(~ toll ~tJ1 interl",;ting ~t()ry. We would rathpr
nnt bore \'111' listeners if "IP can help it. ~c (;'ll'neJ.1lshrnent is som{,··
times ::ddeJ tD m:lximizE' th«inteT'c~t va.luc of the Ir;nratiOI1.
It :is not t':l~)' to dctect how a story lws ~~rowl1 UJlueJ n·tcHing in
this Wil\', Listencr':; usually wi 11 ltav~' asked leading questions and the
stor)' Will have dec'eloped In response to sliGh suggest ion~;, so tha-c it
900n becomes impossihle for the field team to hcar the witness's story
as he told it the first time. In ~;Onh) cases when the witness had heen
interviewed tn this \·my hy local UFO ('nthusiasts, his story was larded
with vivid language ahout visitors frOM outer space that was probabl~
not there in the first tcllin~.
Another kind of di ffi(ulty arise:; in interviewing mult ipj,;, a~;,soci.
ated \dtnf'sse~, that is, wItnesses who wen' together :Jt th.) time that
all (If th(,111 ~a\, the llrn. Whenever several individuab go through an
exciting t:'xpl"rit'nc(' top,cth('I', they art:' ~1J1t tl) spcJld ;1 good deal of
tilll"" di~cussillg it ~lfterwal'J ()lnoop, tl1('JIl~eJve:-;, telllJ1g ;Jnu 1'l'teJLn~
it to each other, lIn,:o!\:-;dtlusIy irDning out ui:;cl'l'}Jancies hetween tlll'l}'
\'ari(1l1~ recollections, :lJ1d gradually conv(.'J'giTlI~ OJI :t :dnf:lt unifor!1l
:In'llunt of the C'xl)(~ricn(:l'. }lo,jrin<lnt pcrson~Jlities will have cOlltributed
mlln' ttl th" fina 1 Vt'I";lOl\ than the les:; dOl1linant. Thus lhe o.:t~)r)' t(11d
bv a !o!rDlip of ;ISS(lI:intC'd I'itnl's:;('~ \~ho tl;)Vl' had ilmple- opportunity to
'\:omparC' notes" \.;i It he lIlore uni t'O!'l1\ than the :!c-,'oU1Hs th~sc individual:;

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, from the classic collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 1497 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.