Documents / Report

Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (the Condon Report, complete, three volumes)

University of Colorado · 1969-01 · 1497 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the final report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, conducted by the University of Colorado under Air Force contract F44620-67-C-0035, with Edward U. Condon as scientific director and Daniel S. Gillmor as editor. It was submitted to the National Academy of Sciences on 15 November 1968 for review. The report includes field studies, photographic and radar analyses, case studies, historical chapters and appendices such as the Robertson Panel report and the Twining letter.

data for a sightIng months or years after the fact. Copies of original radlo:sondt~ recordings should be obt.ained for the closest sites, since these may be analyzed in more detail than that routinely practiced by weather bureaus for synoptic purposes. It should be emphasized that, for example, a. nighttime profile is wmally more germane to a night- time sighting than is a daytime profile. For example, if an OFO incident occurs at 2100 or 2200 1ST, an 0600 LST (next day) l'aob will generally be more pertinent to the propagation conditions involved than will an 1800 LST raob. 111e converse is also true. (41 plore all de:.> i rable Any field team investigating liFO reports and sec}'in~ to ex- radi%ptical propagation aspect~ of the sighting (a highly goal), should be equipped with the following personnel as a minimum: (1) An expert on the unusual aspects of electromagnetic wave propagation, at both radio and optical wave lengths; (2) An expert in the interpretation and thGory of racial targets, who is acquainted with all types of anomalotls propa- gation and other spurioll~ radar returns; (3) An expert with wide experience in the physiology ~nd psychology of human eyesight, and fami liaTity wi th optical illusory effects, etc.; (4) A meteorologist, with specialized experience in micro- meteorology-climatology, mcsoscal~ meteorology, and atmospheric physics. 266 data for a sightIng months or years 3ftcr the fact. Copies of original radlo;:;uncl.C) recordings should be obt.ained for the closest. sites, since these may be analyzed in more detail than that routinely practiced bv weather bureaus for synoptic purposes. It should be emphasized that, for exam? Ie , a. nighttime profile is w;ually more gc-rmalle to a night- time sighting than is a daytime profile. For example, if an liFO incident occurs at 2100 or 2200 un, an 0600 LST (next day) !'aob will generally be more pertinent to the propagation conditions involved than will an 1800 LST raoll. 1110 converse is also true. (4) Any field team investigating liFO reports and seehn~ to ex- plore all radi%ptical propagation aspects of tlle sighting (a highly de;>irable goal), should be equipped with the following personnel as a minimum: (1) An expert on the unusual aspects of electromagnetic wavt' propagation, at both radio and optical wave lengths; (2) An expert in the interpretation and thLoTY of radal target.s, who is acqu~inted with all types of anomalo(ls propa- gation and other SpUr.iOll~ radar returns; (3) An expert with wide experIence in the physiology and psychology of human eyesight, and fami! iarity w:i th optical j llusory effects, etc.; (4) A meteorologist, with specialized experience in mlcro- meteorology-climatology, me50sca10 meteorology, and atmospheric phy;;ics. 266

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, from the classic collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 1497 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.