Documents / Report

Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (the Condon Report, complete, three volumes)

University of Colorado · 1969-01 · 1497 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the final report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, conducted by the University of Colorado under Air Force contract F44620-67-C-0035, with Edward U. Condon as scientific director and Daniel S. Gillmor as editor. It was submitted to the National Academy of Sciences on 15 November 1968 for review. The report includes field studies, photographic and radar analyses, case studies, historical chapters and appendices such as the Robertson Panel report and the Twining letter.

In summary, the conclusions arrived at by the inv~:sti~atol'S in this case seem to be adequately supported by the lneteorological data available. 111e sightin,.; reported for 12 October 1967, 0025 LST, S(\crr.s to be a classic exu!ple of the description of a scintillating, wandering star image seen through a strong inversion layer. Note particularly the estimated ratio of vertical and horizontal movel'lCnts. Two very bdght stars "!Quld have been close to the hor! zon at th is time: Altair, magnitude 0.9, would have ~een at L77° azimuth and about 4° elevation angle; Vega, magnitude 0.1, would have been at about 313 0 azimuth and about ~2° ele'.ation angle. Of the two, Altair scem~ the more likely target hecause of the smaller elevation angle; the observers gave no estimate of either a~imuth or elevation angle. ~umm~ry of H('sul ts . !I. sunml~ry of the resuJ ts of this investigat ion j S Riven in Table 1. '111C rcade~' Sh0UlJ note that the assi;;l1mcl,t of casc'.; into the prob:1ble AP cause category could have been made on the basi s of the observat~Lonal testimony alone. 'l11tlt is to say. ther~ was no ~ase where the mete"JTnIogical (lata avai lable tended to ne!!,a~c the anomalous pl'opagat. ion hypothesi5, thercb)' caus) ng that C,ISC to be (lssi gneu to some other category. Therefore, G review of the Illl'tcorological data availab Ie for the 19 pr~lbab Ie-A:' cases is i 11 oroel'. (1) I~very one of t/ 1 (; 1~) caSl'S is associalcu wi th clear or near· ly clear wathn,at is to ~a)i. t.hcrc: wa~ no case where the metc'Jrrdogical \1ata avai lable tended to Ile)!.a t e the anomalous propagation hypothesis, thereb:' causing that C,lse to he ,lsslgned to some other category. Therefore, c review of the 1l1t·te(lrological data avai lable for the 19 pr"bable-A::' cases is in orllel". (1) Everyone of till" IP eHSt'S i~ associated with clear OJ' nCilr- ly clear wC'atht'r. 111 15 ('(lSI'S ,,Icather is \lcscrihpd ;IS "cl(>ar and visi.hility unli.mited" {CAVU),in many of these Itl~xceptiolla\ visibility" is noted; ill four ca~H3~; the ,~c;lthcr is "p'nl'rally clear," with SOniC' s.:attcrl"ll cloud;;, or a "h,gil, thin broken" condition (\I~\lal1y l1Jefllling drriforllJ douds,. Sud, \~l'nthel' is inciicflt;ve of stable atlJlospheric l"ondjtion~ that lire favorabl(, f r the f()l'IlH1tic·11 or Jilycrnl, strati,fied 26]

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, from the classic collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 1497 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.