Documents / Report

Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (the Condon Report, complete, three volumes)

University of Colorado · 1969-01 · 1497 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the final report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, conducted by the University of Colorado under Air Force contract F44620-67-C-0035, with Edward U. Condon as scientific director and Daniel S. Gillmor as editor. It was submitted to the National Academy of Sciences on 15 November 1968 for review. The report includes field studies, photographic and radar analyses, case studies, historical chapters and appendices such as the Robertson Panel report and the Twining letter.

Airspeed 230 kts, both my copilot and I became
aware of something moving along off our port
be~n at a lower altitude at a distance of maybe
five miles, 111 and out of a broken layer of
Strata Cumulus cloud. As we watched, these ob-
jects climbed above the cloud and we could now
clearly see one large and s':'x small. As we flew
on towards Goose Ray the large object began to
change shape and the smaller to move relative to
the larger .
We informed Goose Bay that we had something
odd in sight and they made arrangements to vector
a fighter (F94?) on to us. Later I changed
radio frequency to contact this fighter; the pilot
told me he had me in sight on redar closing me
head-on at 20 miles. At that the small objects
seemed to enter the larger, and then the big one
shrank. I gave a description of this to the fighter
and a bearing of the objects from mc. I then had
to change back to Goose freqency for descent clear-
ance. I don't know if the fighter saw anything,
as he hadn't landed when I left Goose for London.
nH>, description of the UFO in this case, an opaque, dark "jelly-
fish-like" object, constantly changing shape, is suggestive of an
optical cause. Very little meteorological data are available for this
part of the world on the date in question, so that the presence of
significant optical propagation mechanisms can be neither confirmed
nor ruled out. Nevertheless, certain facts ip the case Bre stroJl~ly
208
Airspeed 230 kts, both my copilot and I became
aware of something moving along off our port
beam a t a lower aIt i tude at a dis tance of maybe
fi ve mi les, iii and out of a br;)ken layer of
Strato Cumulus cloud. As we watched, these ob-
jects climbed above the cloud and we could now
clearly see one lnrge and s~x small. As we flew
on towards l;oose Bay the large object began to
change shape and the smaller to move relative to
the larger .
We informed Goose Bay that we had something
odd in sight and they made arrangements to vector
a fighter (F94?) on to us. Later I changed
radio frequency to contact this fighter; the pilot
told me he had me in sight on redar closing me
head- on at 20 mil es. At tha.t the small ob j ects
seemed to enter the larger, and then the big one
shrank. I gave a description of this to the fighter
and a bearing of the obj ects from me. I then had
to change back to Goose freqency for descent clear-
ance. I don't know if the fighter "'3W anything,
as he hadn't landed when I left Goose for London.
11Hl description of the UFO in thls case, an opaque, dark "jelly-
fish-like" object, constantly changing Shape, is suggestive of an
optical cause. Very little meteorological data are available for this
part of the world on the date in ques t i on, so that the presence of
significant optical propagation mechunisms can be nei ther confirmed
nor ruled out. Nevertheless, certain facts in the case IJre stroJl~ly
208

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, from the classic collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 1497 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.