Documents / Report

Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (the Condon Report, complete, three volumes)

University of Colorado · 1969-01 · 1497 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the final report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, conducted by the University of Colorado under Air Force contract F44620-67-C-0035, with Edward U. Condon as scientific director and Daniel S. Gillmor as editor. It was submitted to the National Academy of Sciences on 15 November 1968 for review. The report includes field studies, photographic and radar analyses, case studies, historical chapters and appendices such as the Robertson Panel report and the Twining letter.

report of the incident besides the timing and the Jack of visual con-
tact by the F-94 -.:rc\v. '111e bright, quas j -stationary object sighed NE
of Haneda AFB, and seen alscJr.roPi Tn~'!likawa AFB (about 30 mi. west of
Haneda AFB), should have been visible to the sou~h of Shirai AFB, but
was never seen by any of a larf;e nup,ber of persons there wh') attempted
.uch observations. Also, at 0012 LSi the object hC'ing tracked by Gel's
CPS-l radar reportedly '~~oke into three smaller contacts maintaining
an interval of about ~4 mile." Thp blips on the CPS-l were described as
small and relatively weak, but sharply defined.
Two things seem apparent: (l) the object seen at Haneda and
Tachika~'a AFB was much farther away than the observers "l:'ealized;
(2) the visual UFO and the target tracked by radar were not the same.
The first statement is supported by the inability of tre ob56rvers
at Shirai to see anything to the south; the second statem~nt is S'Jp-
ported by numerous inconsistencies between the visual and radar
sightings. Tht: two most important of these latter are: (1) During
times when the Gel rauar could not find the target, the visual object
was in about the same location as during those times when it could be
found on radar; (2) lhe visual object was seen for at least five min.
after the time when the airborne radar on the ~-94 indicated that the
UFO had left the areCl at a speed well in excess of 300 mph.
The most likely light source to have produced tile visual object
is the star Capella (magnitude 0.2), \~hich was 8° aJove horizon at
37" azimuth at 2400 LST. lne precise nature of the uptical propagation
mechanism that WQuid have produced such a strangely diffracted image
as reported hy the lIaneua AFB observers must rC111ai n con.; ectura 1. Com-
plete wt'ather data arc not avai lab Ie for thi sease, but it is known
that the light SSE circulation of moist air from 'fokyo Ray was overlain
by a drier SW flow oloft. A gharp temperdture inversion may have
existed at the t01' of this moist layer, helow which patches of fog or
1 Po 7
report of the incident besides the timing and the lack of visual con-
tact by the P-94 ..:rc\,. '111C bright, quasi -stationary object sigh ed NE
of Haneda AFB, and seen ahe. ·r-rori Tac'ldkawa AfB (about 30 mi. west of
Haneda AFB) , should have been visihle to the sou'eh of Shirai AFB, but
was never seen by any of a l"r~e nUIJ,ber of persons there wh:) attempted
.uch observations. Also, at 0012 LSi' the object hC'ing tracked by Gel'!!
CPS-l radar reportedly '~~oke into three smaller contacts maintaining
an interval of about \ mile." The: b lips on the CPS-l were described as
small and relatively weak, but sharply df.,nned.
Two things seem apparent: (1) the object seen at Haneda and
Tachikall'a AFB was much farther away than the observers 'l"ealized;
(2) the visual UFO and the target tracked by radar were not the same,
The first statement is supported by the inability or ti:e obs6rv'ers
at Shi roi to see anythi n~ to the south; the secone! s tatemr,nt is S'Jp-
ported by numerous inconsistencies between the vi sual and radar
sightings. Tht; two most important of these latter are: ~1l During
times when the G\.:r rauar could not find the target, the visual object
was in about the same location flS during those times when it could be
found on radar; (2) 1he visusl object was seen for at least five min.
after the time when the airborne radar on the f·-94 indicated that the
liFO had 1eft the ares at a speed we 1.1 in excess of .3(l() mph.
The most likely light source to have produced the visual ohject
is the star Capella (magnitude 0.2), vlhich was 8° a.ove horizon at
37° azimuth at 2400 LST. The precise nature of the vptiea 1 propagation
mechanism that would have produced such a strangely diffracted image
as reported hy the lIaneua AFB observers must remain conjectural. Com-
plete wt'ather data are not !ivai lab Ie for thi s case, but it is known
that the light SSF. circulation of moist air from Tokyo Ray was overlain
hy a drier SW flow 810ft. A !'hal'p temper,\\'ure invenion may hav('
existed at the tep of this moist layer, helow whicll patehes of fog or
1 I< 7

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, from the classic collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 1497 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.