Documents / Report
This is the final report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, conducted by the University of Colorado under Air Force contract F44620-67-C-0035, with Edward U. Condon as scientific director and Daniel S. Gillmor as editor. It was submitted to the National Academy of Sciences on 15 November 1968 for review. The report includes field studies, photographic and radar analyses, case studies, historical chapters and appendices such as the Robertson Panel report and the Twining letter.
Mr. Hooven's assumption that the minimum strength of magnetic field required to change the established magnetic pattern would be smaller than any field capable of interfering with the car's operation has been verified by a test with 1 kg. field. A magnetron magnet was passed over specified points on the front deck of a 1962 Chevrolet Corvair, and the alteration in magnetic pattern was noted. A 0.4 em. paper tablet was kept between the magnet and the car deck to prevent physi~al contact. The maximum field strength penetrating the tablet was measured with a Bell "120" gaussmflter. with Model T-1201 probe, and was found to be 1 kg. (one inch away from the tablet, ""hich was held against the magnet poles, the maximum field was measured as 235 g.). The vbserved alterations in magnetic pattern are shown in T~ble 1 which gives the directioT:s a compass needle pointed when the compass was placed on the selected test points 6 in. apart located as shown in Fig. 1. The measurements aljo demonstrate both the permanence of pattern alteration and alteration due to bending and straightening of the car deck. The car was facing 1800 T. dUling all measuremenrs. The third and fourth columns of Table 1 show definitely that the passage of I-kg. magnetic field completely determines the residual magnetic pattern. Subsequent co~pass readings, except for unexplainea anomaly at point 29, show the last alteration to be the one retained. The car under study was involved in a collisioll on 21 August. Figures in the right column of Table 1 show the magnetic pattern after straight- ening and repainting. All compass readings shown are accurate to within 20 _3°. Each set of rc~dings was recorded without reference to prior readings, with which they were compared only subsequently. The repro- ducibility, in most cases, is surprising. When test points were ncar sharp changes in magnetic orientati0n, a slight error in point relocation 156 Mr. Hooven's assumption that the minimum strength of magnetic field required to change the established magnetic pattern would be smaller than any field capable of interfering with the car's operation has been verified by a test with I kg. field. A magnetron magnet was passed over specified points on the front deck of a 1962 Chevrolet Corvair, and the alteration in magnetic pattern was noted. A 0.4 cm. paper tablet was kept between the magnet and the car deck to prevent physi.;:al contact. The maximum field strength penetrating the tablet was measured with a Bell "120" gaussl)1eter, with Model T-1201 prote, and was found to be 1 kg. (one inch away from the tablet, I"hich was held against the magnet poles, the maximum field was measund as 235 g.). The ubserved alterations in magnetic pattel'n are shown in Ts.ble 1 which gives the directior,s a compass needle pointed when the compass was placed on the selected test points 6 in. apart located as shown in Fig. 1. The measurements aLo demonstratt' both the permanence of pattern alteration and alteration due to bending and straightening of the car deck. The car was facin~ 1800 T. UUJ fng all measuremenr s. The t~ird and fourth columns of Table 1 !':hoh' definitely that the passage of I-kg. magnetic field completely determines the residual magnetic pattern. Subsequent co~pass readings, except for unexplainea anomaly at point 29, show the last alteration to be the one retained. The car under study was involved in a collision on 21 August. Hgures in the right column of Table I show the magnetic pattern after straight- ening and repainting. All compass readings shown are accurate to within 2°_3°. Each set of readings was recorded without reference to pnor readings, with which they were compared only subsequflI1tly. The repro- ducibility, in most cases, is surprising. When test points were ncar sharp changes in magnetic oricntati0n, a 51ight error in point relocation 156
Report, from the classic collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 1497 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.