Documents / Report

Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects (the Condon Report, complete, three volumes)

University of Colorado · 1969-01 · 1497 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the final report of the Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, conducted by the University of Colorado under Air Force contract F44620-67-C-0035, with Edward U. Condon as scientific director and Daniel S. Gillmor as editor. It was submitted to the National Academy of Sciences on 15 November 1968 for review. The report includes field studies, photographic and radar analyses, case studies, historical chapters and appendices such as the Robertson Panel report and the Twining letter.

the:' producing hy optical and other means of anitnaup falsely alleged
tl) be a re,11 physical entity ;It the scen\..:. Iktuucheu negatives, douhle
C'xpn5U1"e:" ;lI\d ",upcrimposcu ll1l,lgCS arc examl,jl~ oj' the latter.
l;t'lH'rall~', phvsic.tl fahric,ltiol1s meet tests ()f c(1Il~;i"tence in light-
ing and :-hadow but fail tests of size or di~;tanlc. Most commonly,
photographs of mode 1s are nut of focus, or have i ncons i stcnt f()cu~~
~,('tl'.'een the "UFO" and other objL'cts at it>; alleged Jistar.cc. Optical
fabrications, on the other hand, may show in~onsistencies in lighting
between background and UPO details, or in the case of monta?cs,
image flm,'s.
Plate -: is an example of the simplest and most common type of
ph~'5jcal f,lbrication - a disk-shaped moJel thrown into the nir by
hand. 1'1,1u'S Rand 9 arc examples of morc~ complex fabrications -
i1 model su~~ppnded from a stri ng and a ni gilt -tirr,e photograph of a
hanJ··held 11I0\il'~ i llumin:lteu by flashlight. '['he c three photographs
~'(>r(' made /1.1' the wri tel'. Plates 8 :md ~ were nl,ldc for comparison
\'.'i tl1 the Santa ;\na :mu :-Jorth East urn photo~riiph5 (C"scs 52 and 53).
Plates 10, 11, and 12 Clrc ex;;mplcs of optical fahrications maJc by
thl' writer.
S. Techlliqu~ of i\nal,tsi~
Photographic evidence acquires probative value onlY when ~nown
natural phenomena can be ruled out and it can be shov:n that a fabr-i-
cat i Oil \.;15 not cas)' O.r" conven i cnt.
F:uly iI' the stlld;', it was deeiJed not to select (lr analyzc euch
(·\"e by a prcJ('t'crmilleJ loutine. Hat/wI', l:ascs WC1'C studieJ i.n terms
llf theil' i111ividual dlClractedstics. Lil(j~ndstic clwraderistics
illdu,lC'd such properti,'s as (ll potential stereoscopy. (2) reports
h \. III \l J 'c i pI (' \' i s II a I ~'i t n (' s s (' s, (.n c, (J ud III () t ion s) ( tween tilt' "LIFO" and other ObjL'Cts ;It it~; alleged distar.cL'. Optical
fabrications, on the other hDnd, may show inconsi:;tencles in lighting
between tn('kground and UFO detaj 15, or in the C;ISe of flIonta,:cs,
ililage flnlVs.
Plat,. "7 is an example of the simplest anu most commun type of
ph)'sical f~lbl'ication - iI disk-shaped moJel thrown into the air by
hall'\' I'l cX;iTnples of optical fnhricfltlOIlS m,hJc by
the writer.
S. TecJ1}.~3.lI~ of JI..!l;,llx.=i~~
Phot0grap~jc evidence acquires probative value only when ~n()Wh
natural p!1(,!10ml'n:l can be ruled out and it can be s!1Q\>:n that s, ,Il c.uud II\lJti()Il~, (~') usc of hrllC t()
def nm :15 !' igll i fi callt.
In the ,,:oLlrse of tht' invE'sti~:atjoll, <lllalysis uf the forC'goillg
Lhariicteri~tics f)f Ul'l) photographs l'c~llltl'din 0111' developing :1 set
e'f pr[)tuclli~ useful in the assIgning prioritiC's tn UFO phQtograph~;
115

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, from the classic collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 1497 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.