,
. 1 '2
JUN 11175;
Hr. Welter 5. Rourke s
Oifice of hSSiStfiflt Commissioner iinspection)
Internal fiecurity Division _
Investigation Branch
Internal fiovenue Service
Washington. D.C. Z0224
,v
Dear Mr. hoorke:
Pursoont to our conversations on 13 June 1975, the
following information is provided in regard to those
instances where the Central Intelligence Agency's Office
of Security has obtained federal t"x information from the
Internal Revenue Service. .
‘in:
Attached hereto as Tabs A through K are copies of the
pertinent portions of Office of Security investigative
reports endfor memorande, which oeztain to each of those
instances where IRS information has been obtained. However,
it should he noted that in KSHY of these cases the informa-
tion cestsieed in these reports is quite limited and does
not reflect the extent to which the IRS tax records had
been made available. '
-;
Furth*~ there is e discrepancy in the number of
cases where the Agency has received federal tax informa-
tion concerning an individual or firm as indicated in
the rope: orepared by the Presidential Commission to
Investigate the Central Intelligence Agency. Due to a
typographical error on a'sucnsry chart provided by the
Agency to the Presidential Commission, which numerically
listed the entire spectrum of cases of "Alleged Illegal
Domestic Activities," two cases were listed on the chart
as “IRS reviews," when in fact they should have been
listed oeeet the "mail covers" section of that chart. %
As a result, there are actually only fourteen (Id) instances,
as opposeo to the sixteen (16) reoorted by the Presidential
Commission. In addition, the fositeen IRS reviews occurred
05 5* 36/6*;
(.1 *1 I
(4
cussmzn BY 01l§_1..3 I
_H___'
EXEMPT FROM GEHERAL DECL|\5§lFla'_'_-\T|Q§'i
SCHEDULE 01: E. O. 11552, EXEM?l‘lUN -‘.I.3-'l’ECDJ'-(Y:
§ 5B(-U. (Z). (3) or (4) (tirtlr one or more)
AUTUMAITCALLY D£€LA>5n1lD on
Impossible to Determine
r'H*~,,g"~_':='\? . I We --- s -.-.--__ _~ __
(rm!-sz im oaaible -~ -Q '
:n;_._;tLi_‘__ _
~ P , D--£9. can or event)
' \