David E. Hanlon Ralph Orcutt Edmund X. Klipa (Possible Contact by the Senate Select Committee Staff)

!‘\ " Y 7"-"' “ ‘I n -um €L)ixil9nE./£197‘ i nlli z .1 a 1-1 r"--Q n-,_, .3 n*"' ff. 29 June 1972 - The item on Jack Anderson's report on Sino-Soviet relations does not, by itself, present a -problern. However, the re.ference to intelli- gence coverage of a Soviet military exercise probably - should be paraphrased if not completely deleted. gg. 12 July 1972 —- No problem with the re.ference to a SALT briefing, previous remarks on the subject applying here. ' hh. 13 July 1972 — The reference to use of Agency reports mentioned in Anderson's colunm presents the old question of official confirmation. Any decisionon release of this should take into consideration what was done under FGIA requests. No other problems. ii. 14 July 1972 — I have no problems with release of the information on a SALT briefing. jj. 19 July 1972 — No problem on the reference to a SA.LT briefing, except the same comments made earlier on the existence of briefing materials. kk. 21 July 1972 — I have no problems with the report on the Senate briefing, but OLC may find that the "advice and counsel“ issue may be raised by the phrasing of the comment. . 11. 24 July 1972 - No problern with the item rnarked on the first page o.f the minutes. The DDO should comment on the item marked on the second page. _ _ mm. 25 July 1972 - No problem. nn. 27 July 1972 - No problem. _ oo. 21 August 1972 — I don't see how we can object to this, whatever it really refers to. -pp. 4 December 1972 - No problerns. _ 5 _ {__<‘h_\ _vv:_\._’ _‘ ._...‘,.,.: 1,. -=7 ‘T,~ 1-.1-.-'=\i 4 Uviva 2'-..¢’1.tiuah‘_ii...