K ~
1
‘lfliégf/&Uy£:>.~ mam J
--
I
-sF&8H:_ __ .
* '
‘
'
The y-.\l;.co'r_c‘:[::’ t
‘F-fig) _:
K
_.D_“~5_; 3i fanuery .
,
» r
I c R -
§
3%‘ FRO“ :
Tom Pirtpodi _
H
i
s
.7. .
.|
I
1
».
.2?!
0;.
Q5 .
"\
:1:
~
.
1“
‘.7! ~
‘.
returns fo7r_t13_e_p_re_y;g_g_s'_~:\;_\;_e':féerfsstxbmitted b;i_‘.»'v’OODSCJ_\1’.“;.-Tfhese_ returns were 1n 0rc1_e_r__§r_1_d _no_1rreguIar1t1_es were noted- VIQODSON, 1s'“ca"sr2/in 1- ~- - > -*
— e c aumed no deducuons and avarled hzmselt olftthe
~ ,4, -. . '
-* ". standard fixed deductions. He was div'0rced from RUBY in 1957 a
-
pays £51-"the ‘sm H
' " '
"Q
-...
upport of a male chfld born 1n I956. His return for_
year 1Uf;7_6_6_ \v_as__agrdited"._concerning a discrepancy in support payments-This was subseouentlv resolver! 1.\/r\_r\_1-qr“: ,-~-
-consu1ta_nt‘\'/ith the e>;c1se tax division of the Internal Revenue Service-
3. I-LALEY was advised that this Avenc P has no reason to recuest 21'1"
V
5D ~ H
¢ ;
delay in any action*_c_ontemplated by the IRS in’ proceeding; against
M 'Ia;nti1t;ye Z ‘ _ »- , and wife for allegedly failing to file their izzcorne V
P’
tax returns. '. -" '
' 1
' " h t
QQ W Fl‘ H.
>\‘r~¢0 ‘:3
_ _ . 4. _- ~._/~.-\._‘ #3 -\kJL\J_)‘¢‘.;. Iden _Zw ., His '~vi"e a d "-‘""1 r > ‘- ' ‘ ‘
L n Let. er , z=.nc_ that tollowzzzg the inter-— 3'
u
- . . ~
F V
‘
vzews all bank records W111 Qe rev1ew_ec1 to be tollozveci by e net: warts:
\
.
evaluatlon. B/Ir. HALEY assured me that he will ice-e-is this officeapprised of all significant deyelopznents rnake an oral wee’~:i~-
-~;..._...
_
~
5__8§_.|MF>DET CL‘ BY£&jH-7.91
‘|
___ -._..._. ...._..,-._. _-_..-_,._ .-. _*... . _..__._‘..,_-W -_ ..._..
Z1 ‘ I
( .\ /~.\._
-g,¢ \ \.
1}
torn T.
_i
Federei l
-_.'
on is therefore we ‘e
4'
_..-n
t