v .
1
e____________________
~ *SEfiRH~ -. P1157
‘ I ‘. '
I
V
Q .
z\:'
Q1
9
\
I
-
2
0
0
M 6; Arlreview of Su‘cjec‘c.'s income tax reports i.'o:c' tfie Cal§_::!}_a;-
Iffedl‘ 0-L 1996 reveals that during this nerioql the Sub-=¢¢_'e,.,_ .
"="'P91"°}?iEla’f'9lY 1&5 transacztions invclvinf" the n-~:¢'-;aS=.J;~5 “iageg la
1“-1 ~ --
”
. 5 “'-“~‘* - "1 $330Su»:>Cf:S.‘ fkltncugh the number of transactions vrhich ~£;::-01: nlace werequit“ I115“! the average arm-mlt of each transaction was relaeiipw
sr:-.a.J_l and the total .a_mcu.n’c of money involved 'j‘}'Q"‘ p».Oba= 1 lg.“ “Q; End" Q31 get “ts aeaimgs
‘ _ . u .~.a._,,;4\,. ._, :~ f--~ .3-' Y
‘chat the previously mentioned un=~,U1a5__,Pd QHSQ-wl 3 £1.20 Cf“? “ii
n-» ‘I’ ""3 “" "“‘- vi CV?‘ -‘- -:
OfI.lC8 may be accounted for by his going; doim to c;iscvelat='Q-=-
Such business transactions vrit‘-1 It ~.¢,.-._,,,. Z. bl 1,“
that in addition '50 tha 1&5 ‘bra:1sec'bions ‘n'h5 c:r~
C -8 v-\_-|-kl ' .L 1 - _ ha.‘ , _
_~__J' L‘ U“ *1) H_"‘L“"
on Illul1u°C wshat che 5uo3€c‘E._, a.c:»\.u.';'ll_I'lj-:; "that these deals *.\.»'e;-e
haifldléd fl1'~1"°'1l§’,h , had numerous other 1:.1eet,;;':;¢,5 ;-;a~';_h
reLat11'e to deals on the stock eav-L-Q3 -,1»-la ¢-L -Terqon g '
,_
'
. . V
.
‘
.
‘ -“ --~ -¢- = - --- “'-.."'.."“' 11* - “
0fJ_:r_ce an-0. would indicate that the Su'Qjr>C'{; iq @_=;_¢,lJ-Z: '1 ?‘b tn?
-ho-r-_-I-€1I~,d_ 0+1, h;s prix_5t_o qpfgi“~ v L;l--Q 4'1}:-::r-1\,JP L.-IEIE-.‘
~ -1- .~ '\_ \.. ¢.,L __ $3, . .
_
7. In line vrith 6u2:- recent discussion of T“".fI',L_-brr;- ~ FL Q
lnvestigaiion is in Dl"0gv~e_.-_;S Em u ~Ti3_]_ ‘V\¢} 5.1-,-* ,,'";I. II’ In "‘f?"*7
_ "‘ - I L-‘V, ;;~§_L :..S".,_ Z 7"" - —'--
as Soon as they are received. >
1 e >.. €.:n.?_..\..a
pd
‘
/ __
.-E‘,/’. €\:\ 1 _/Q‘-'ifJ-’"‘§\, R _-,¢/I
' ~’ / "
/" -
' ~
. Y :5f I —-1 - -r},/L’ .
‘ I -’—*"" "*5-_/."*'**"°'-al‘ ,‘ -
_ __ _ ___,. . V . ' ~\_ _. _.‘_ _.¢ .- _. . ~ /» .-
_
-~ _-_ > V. _. ~
, _ _x
'»----J §“Ti>L/ ,_. -"if"? .' .-
1‘ \\
.
‘. _
\ ,'
1-~-. _
,- ‘,
I
_.
r -‘ \
X
r-
1 \ _’ ~ '_ .1
2