'
5: .1i;iJ“1' '!-7*‘-’F’
?Hfimfin+—1 I
1 _? ‘Li’ '$*
1
fir. Walter G. Rourke
Office of Assistant Commissioner (Inspeation)
internal Security Division -
Investigation Branch
internal Revenue Servica
Waahington, D.C. 28224
Dear Mr. Rourke:
Pursuant to our conversatinns on 13 June 1975, the
follewing infcrmation is provided in regard ta those
instances where the Central Intelligence Agency's Officenf Security has abtained federal tax information from theInternal Revenue Sarvicc.
'13Attached hereto .5 Tabs A through K are copiss of thepertinent portions of Office of Security investigative
reports and/or memoranda, which partain to aach of taose
instances where IRS information has been obtained. Howevur,it should be noted that in many of these casas the informa»fiinn contained in these reports is quite limited and doesnot reflect the extent to which the IRS tax wecorda hadbeen mad@ available. »
Further, there is a discrepancy in the nfluber mi
cases where the Agency has received federal tan inf0?na~
tian concerning an individual or firm as indicated inthe repwrt prepared by the Presidential Commissien £0
Investigate the Central Intelligence Agency. Due fa Q
zypagraphical err0r_0n a summary chart prevified by ?h¢
Aqeucy tn the Presidential Commissiun, which numericallylisted the entire spectrum of cases sf "fillsfied lliefiaiGnmestic Activitibs," two cases were listed on v*¢rtas "IRS reviews,” when in fact thmy should havw nuen
listed under the “mail cavers" section of that u te
As a result, there are actually Qnly fourteen }$E(~JJflas apposed ts the xixteen (16) reported by tic »$@atia1Swmmission. In additinn, the feurtsen ER3 Teviews unnuvred
.:uflLu OM
Impossible to Determine
»w~T3;#.-iug
W. .i.:':i:." ’“?i2IIliYf:._iiif’,'I =
__
I
i
@
1
i
Z
i
s
x
: