13-00000
CONFIDENTIAL
(g) Memorandum, dated 16 May 1968; Subject: Investigation in Japan of Report of Suspicious Action of Another Subject who was Originally Described as Resembling Suspected Assassin; contains information provided by the Japanese National Police Agency; exempt under (b)(3)(a), (b)(6), and (b)(1)5B(1).
(h) Memorandum for the Record, dated 19 April 1968; Subject: Unknown Subject, possibly identifiable with Eric Starvo Galt; the information was based on clandestine photography of the Cuban embassy in Mexico City; exempt under (b)(3)(a); (b)(6) and (b)(1)(5)B(1).
3. the following documents concern the James Earl Ray case but do not mention the Subject by name. All are exempt under (b)(3)(a) and (b)(6).
(a) Eight biographic sketches on individuals thought to be associated with the Ray case.
(b) Memorandum, dated 17 April 1968; Subject: Gerald Lee Richards.
(c) The Hague-4137 (IN-94424), dated 19 April 1968; station and liaison traces provided no evidence that Subject had ever been in the Netherlands; exemptions (b)(1)5B(1) also applies.
(d) La Paz-4228 (IN-94482), dated 19 April 1968; La Paz morning papers carried photos of FBI Wanted Posters.
(e) Caracas-9414 (IN-94487), dated 19 April 1968; requests photo be pouched.
(f) San Jose-0157 (IN-94496), dated 19 April 1968; requests photo be pouched.
(g) Director-93306, dated 19 April 1968; states that two copies of photo sent 19 April.
(h) Director-92897, dated 19 April 1968; states two copies of photos sent.
(i) Director-92895, dated 19 April 1968; states two copies of photos sent.
6
CONFIDENTIAL
Note: Handwritten annotations and marginalia (e.g., “375”, “From 30 Jul 71”, “Memo to Doolpic from OPS/ITG”, “OS Referrals”, “379”, “376-378”, “381-388”, “389”, “390”, “391”, “392”, “393”, “394”, “395”, “396”, “369”, “King”, “380”, “381”, “382”, “383”, “384”, “385”, “386”, “387”, “388”, “389”, “390”, “391”, “392”, “393”, “394”, “395”, “396”, “369”, “King”, “380”, “381”, “382”, “383”, “384”, “385”, “386”, “387”, “388”, “389”, “390”, “391”, “392”, “393”, “394”, “395”, “396”) are not transcribed as they are not part of the typed document content. The document’s structure and all typed text are preserved exactly as requested.