Documents / Document

Black Vault compilation, pp. 91-93

The Black Vault · 134 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Black Vault compilation contains a September 1997 reply from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense to John Greenewald's FOIA request, enclosing its UFO records. The enclosures include a Navy information sheet dismissing the Philadelphia Experiment and an Air Force UFO fact sheet listing 12,618 Project Blue Book sightings, 701 of them unidentified. They also include the National Academy of Sciences review endorsing the University of Colorado report and the concluding pages of a 1994 Air Force Roswell report attributing the wreckage to Project MOGUL.

  • p. 107 …Additionally, many claims of a flying saucer crash at Roswell rest on the description of debris…
  • p. 108 …not compare the descriptions of the suspect debris with that of the components of a Project…
  • p. 111 …Prior to that, the incident was dismissed because the AAF originally identified the debris recovered as…
  • p. 114 …When the debris was gathered up the tinfoil, paper, tape, and sticks made a bundle about…
  • p. 115 …Marcel, claimed that he had recovered UFO debris near Roswell in 1947. Also in 1978, a…
  • p. 116 example, it was originally reported that there was only recovery· of debris from one site. This…
  • p. 118 …the exact location(s) of the purported debris, and the extent of the wreckage. Such discrepancies…
  • p. 121 …forth as a possible explanation for the debris recovered near Roswell. Since much of this testing…
  • p. 124 …There were three categories of debris: a thick, foil like metallic gray substance; a brittle, brownish…
  • p. 125 …The debris looked like pieces of a large balloon which had burst. The pieces were .small…
  • p. 126 accompanied Major Marcel to the ranch to recover the debris, sometimes along with his Counter Intelligence…
  • p. 129 …Lt Col Cavitt described a small area of debris which appeared, "to resemble bamboo type square…
  • p. 130 …Pflock concluded from his research that the Brazel Ranch debris originally reported as a "flying disc…
  • p. 132 …This organiza- tion was able to obtain measurements from the "sticks" visible in the debris after…
  • p. 134 …Photos of ML-307C/ AP Device, With Vintage Neoprene Balloon and Debris 32. Synopsis of Balloon…
23-24). These interviews confirmed that Project MOGUL was a compartmented,
sensitive effort. The NYU group was responsible for developing constant level
balloons and telemetering equipment that would remain at specified altitudes
(within the acoustic duct) while a group from Columbia was to develop acoustic
sensors. Doctor Spilhaus, Professor Moore, and certain others of the group were
aware of the actual purpose of the project, but they did not know of the project
nickname at the time. They handled casual inquiries and / or scientific inqui·
ries/papers in terms of ''unclassified meteorological or balloon research." Newly
hired employees were not made aware that there was anything special or
classified about their work; they were told only that their work dealt with
meteorological equipment.
An advance ground team, led by Albert P. Crary, preceded the NYU group to
Alamogordo Army Air Field, New Mexico, setting up ground sensors and
obtaining facilities for the NYU group. Upon their arrival, Professor Moore and
his team experimented with various configurations of neoprene balloons;
development of balloon "trains" (see illustration, Atch 25); automatic ballast
systems; and use of Naval sonobuoys (as the Watson Lab acoustical sensors had
not yet arrived). They also launched what they called "service flights." These
"service flights" were not logged nor fully accounted for in the published
Technical Reports generated as a result of the contract between NYU and Watson
Labs. According to Professor Moore, the "service flights" were composed of
balloons, radar reflectors, and payloads specifically designed to test acoustic
sensors (both early sonobuoys and the later Watson Labs devices). The "payload
equipment" was expendable, and some carried no "Reward" or "Return to ..."
tags because there was to be no association between these flights and the logged
constant altitude flights which were fully acknowledged. The NYU balloon flights
were listed sequentially in their reports (i.e., A, B, or 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 .. .), yet gaps
. existed for Flights 2-4 and Flight 9. The interview with Professor Moore indicated
that these gaps werE' the unlogged "service flights."
Professor Moore, the on-scene Project Engineer, gave detailed information
concerning his team's efforts. He recalled that radar targets were used for tracking
balloons because they did not have all the necessary equipment when they first
arrived in New Mexico. Some of the early developmental radar targets were
manufactured by a toy or novelty company. These targets were made up of
aluminum "foil " or foil-backed paper, balsa wood beams that were coated in an
"Elmer' s·type" glue to enhance their durability, acetate and / or cloth reinforcing
tape, single strand and braided nylon twine, brass eyelets and swivels to form a
multi·faced reflector somewhat similar in construction to a box kite (see photo.
graphs, Atch 26). Some of these targets were also assembled with purplish-pink
tape with symbols on it (see drawing by Moore with Atch 21).
According to the log summary (Atch 27) of the NYU group, Flight A through
Flight 7 (November 20, 1946-July 2, 1947) were made with neoprene meteorologi·
cal balloons (as opposed to the later flights made with polyethylene balloons).
Professor Moore stated that the neopre~e balloons were susceptible to degrada-
26

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 134 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.