Documents / Document
Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, Volume 1 (scan)
NASA via ibiblio · 1969-07-31 · 251 pages · text by OCR
This is Volume 1 of NASA's Apollo 11 Technical Crew Debriefing, dated July 31, 1969. The Mission Operations Branch of the Flight Crew Support Division at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston prepared it, and it was originally classified Confidential. In it Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins go phase by phase through suiting, launch, powered flight, Earth orbit and lunar surface activities. They comment on suit fit, vibration, checklists, lunar dust, footing and poor sleeping conditions in the lunar module. A section titled Visual Sightings appears in the table of contents.
“Reading”19 pages
- p. 30 …It was impossible to read an effect on any indicator in the cockpit.
COLLINS This is…
- p. 38 …the expected altitude was 174 and we read 176. The EMS was 3.3 plus.
ARMSTRONG…
- p. 39 …There's no way that the EMS could read 99.1 at docking.
As I recall…
- p. 40 ## CONFIDENTIAL
Then I thrusted minus X until the DELTA-V counter read minus 100.5. I…
- p. 46 …Neil and I both read a memo put out by MPAD, saying that for some failure…
- p. 50 …We gave daily dosimeter readings, which as far as I'm concerned fall in a sort…
- p. 51 …COLLINS And the dosimeter we just gave them a once-a-day reading on that dosimeter…
- p. 68 …When you read me the numbers, you didn't note that I read star number 2…
- p. 79 …The cabin temperature (translunar) was slightly warmer than we would like it, although the gage readings…
- p. 130 …We had good helium pressure and read that out to MSFN. We went through the RCS…
- p. 132 …the AGS, and give you an erroneous reading so you wouldn't pass. In any case…
- p. 134 …There is a bad amount of data that the ground reads up to you in that…
- p. 151 …They did approach the maximum numbers with a reading of approximately 94. Anyway, they weren't…
- p. 169 …with time as evidenced by successive LPD readings.
FCOD REP. Do you recall when you proceeded…
- p. 170 …again, although at the time we were reading relatively low tank pressures. I think the OX…
- p. 172 …We read the sine and cosine out of AGS (and I'm sure they copied that…
- p. 175 …we were going to launch, so we read through the remainder of the simulated countdown and…
- p. 235 …same exercises such as pressure-integrity check, reading the cabin down, and configuring the ECS. I…
- p. 236 …We used a sequence of marking that involved an onboard averaging of five successive cursive readings…
## CONFIDENTIAL
ALDRIN Maybe.
6.27 HIGH GAIN ANTENNA PTC REACQ CHECK
COLLINS We did it coming back.
ALDRIN When it worked, it worked like a charm. There were a couple of times when it didn't seem to want to work.
6.28 OPTICS CALIBRATION
COLLINS Optics CAL the next day worked fine.
6.29 FUEL CELL PERFORMANCE AND PURGING
COLLINS The fuel cells performed perfectly. Purging didn't present any problems. We followed the checklist on the heaters and they worked normally.
6.30 LM AND TUNNEL PRESSURE
COLLINS LM and tunnel pressures were normal.
6.31 LATCH VERIFICATION
COLLINS Latches, as I say, were all verified. Latch number 6 required one actuation to cock. That was the only anomaly and it was within the realm of normal.
6.32 INSPECTION OF TUNNEL MECHANICS
COLLINS I'm not sure what that means, but everything in the tunnel was normal.
## CONFIDENTIAL
About this file
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 251 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.